H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Aleksandra Krunic H2H: 1-1

Laura Siegemund and Aleksandra Krunic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aleksandra Krunic leads 1–0 on clay, while Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2024 Miami Open first round 4-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Aleksandra Krunic
Serbia Age 33 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Siegemund #90 4-6 6-2 6-2 Aleksandra Krunic #626 Match data Mar 21, 2024* R128 Miami Open WTA 1000 Hard
Aleksandra Krunic #105 6-3 6-4 Laura Siegemund #225 Match data Jul 14, 2022* R32 Budapest WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Aleksandra Krunic #470 #39 1,210 1,771 87 120 42.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Aleksandra Krunic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2011 2–2 50.0% #223 1,504 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2012 2–1 66.7% #165 1,525 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2013 0–4 0.0% #151 1,463 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2014 5–6 45.5% #87 1,523 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 2015 12–19 38.7% #108 1,543 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2016 4–12 25.0% #144 1,595 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2017 20–13 60.6% #54 1,753 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2018 20–23 46.5% #55 1,713 0 2
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 2019 5–14 26.3% #163 1,556 0 2
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1 2021 6–6 50.0% #128 1,643 0 2
29 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2 2022 9–10 47.4% #115 1,635 0 2
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2 2024 2–7 22.2% #286 1,603 0 2
32 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2 2025 0–3 0.0% #468 1,565 0 2
33 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2 — — — — — — —
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Siegemund Aleksandra Krunic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 8 15 23 34.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
26 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2021 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — 2022 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0% — 41 69 110 37.3% 33 39 72 45.8% 13 12 25 52.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 187/204 of Aleksandra Krunic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Siegemund Aleksandra Krunic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 2/4 3.0 1.0 64.4% 78.7% 70.1% 50.0% 58.3% 75.8% 52.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 2.0 6.3 48.1% 63.1% 40.4% 51.5% 68.5% 51.0% 50.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 4/4 1.3 4.5 48.9% 59.7% 50.2% 45.6% 42.5% 54.7% 42.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 9/11 3.2 4.1 56.7% 64.0% 45.1% 44.4% 49.5% 55.7% 39.9%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5% 2015 23/31 2.6 2.6 57.1% 60.9% 48.4% 49.1% 45.7% 54.9% 37.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 15/16 1.3 2.3 63.0% 58.0% 43.8% 35.6% 38.2% 52.8% 42.1%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 32/33 2.2 1.9 63.6% 64.5% 50.3% 51.1% 51.6% 59.5% 48.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 40/43 1.6 2.2 63.4% 61.4% 49.2% 52.9% 39.9% 56.5% 43.2%
26 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0% 2019 19/19 1.1 2.1 63.0% 56.1% 47.8% 53.8% 36.9% 52.9% 39.4%
27 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0% 2021 12/12 2.0 1.5 57.1% 64.4% 50.9% 42.3% 67.7% 58.8% 44.0%
29 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8% 2022 19/19 1.8 2.7 58.8% 62.4% 50.4% 58.2% 48.6% 57.7% 44.1%
30 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2% 2024 9/9 1.8 2.6 61.6% 55.9% 46.5% 47.2% 47.4% 52.4% 40.9%
32 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1% — 187/207 1.9 2.4 60.8% 61.4% 48.7% 49.8% 46.4% 56.3% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Siegemund Aleksandra Krunic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1504 105.6 +1.42 +0.02 2.172 63.5% — — — 33.3% +0.33 — — — +0.40
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1526 101.6 -1.43 +0.94 1.036 51.0% +12 — — 62.5% +1.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.27
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1463 96.7 -1.74 -1.39 0.941 48.2% +24 — — 27.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.48
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1524 119.6 -0.18 -0.41 0.902 48.4% +2 — — 46.2% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.31
22 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 2015 1543 109.3 -2.03 -3.19 0.832 46.3% -35 -23 +122 40.0% -0.91 4–4 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.3 +0.06
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1595 118.6 -1.15 -1.51 0.893 47.6% -54 +15 +43 27.3% -1.30 0–1 1–1 — -1.00
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1753 130.9 +2.13 +3.51 1.197 53.9% -68 +21 — 59.2% +0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.88
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1714 131.0 -0.44 -0.20 0.992 49.5% -69 +26 +49 44.3% -0.43 8–5 (62%) 5–3 (63%) 105.6 -0.57
26 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44 2019 1557 107.2 -2.43 -3.32 0.836 46.4% -17 +146 — 27.5% -1.58 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.16
27 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49 2021 1644 126.9 +1.13 +0.71 1.067 51.3% -4 +67 — 43.5% +0.17 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.04
29 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87 2022 1635 120.3 +0.48 +1.43 1.042 50.8% -31 +63 +22 48.8% -0.05 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.11
30 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08 2023 1633 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71 2024 1604 109.4 -1.80 -1.53 0.858 46.5% -21 — +83 30.4% -1.48 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 -0.04
32 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05 2025 1566 106.9 — — — — — +73 — 25.0% -2.50 0–2 — — -0.70
33 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72 2026 1551 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1749 132.0 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.76 — 1772 124.4 -0.34 -0.21 0.983 49.6% -39 +40 +64 42.5% -0.51 23–30 (43%) 18–19 (49%) 97.4 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.