H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Anastasija Sevastova H2H: 1-2

Anastasija Sevastova holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anastasija Sevastova leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2019 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Anastasija Sevastova
Latvia Age 36 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasija Sevastova #13 6-4 6-3 Laura Siegemund #99 Match data Apr 26, 2019* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Laura Siegemund #37 6-2 6-4 Anastasija Sevastova #26 Match data Apr 8, 2017* QF Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Anastasija Sevastova #66 6-3 6-2 Laura Siegemund #43 Match data Jul 16, 2016* SF Bucharest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Anastasija Sevastova #499 #11 3,366 1,956 209 178 54.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Anastasija Sevastova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #261 1,510 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 5–9 35.7% #79 1,531 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2010 22–15 59.5% #45 1,699 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2011 12–18 40.0% #98 1,622 0 1
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #184 1,605 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 2013 2–2 50.0% #148 1,618 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2015 5–3 62.5% #113 1,650 0 1
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 2016 22–19 53.7% #34 1,713 0 1
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 2017 37–24 60.7% #16 1,821 0 2
28 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1 2018 44–22 66.7% #11 1,918 0 3
29 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2 2019 27–22 55.1% #27 1,759 0 4
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2 2020 1–9 10.0% #54 1,649 0 4
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2 2021 17–18 48.6% #70 1,712 0 4
32 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2 2022 1–2 33.3% #680 1,699 0 4
33 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2 2024 4–2 66.7% #481 1,712 0 4
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2 2025 9–11 45.0% #188 1,723 0 4
36 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2 — — — — — — —
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Siegemund Anastasija Sevastova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 11 8 19 57.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2016 10 10 20 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 15 7 22 68.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
28 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2018 26 14 40 65.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 10 13 23 43.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2022 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2024 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2025 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
36 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0% — — — — — 113 106 219 51.6% 73 51 124 58.9% 23 19 42 54.8% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 369/387 of Anastasija Sevastova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Siegemund Anastasija Sevastova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 1.0 2.0 68.6% 61.0% 55.0% 52.2% 50.3% 59.0% 49.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 13/14 1.9 3.8 57.7% 60.9% 42.7% 46.5% 52.6% 53.4% 42.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 34/37 1.9 3.1 59.7% 61.0% 48.4% 50.1% 50.5% 56.0% 44.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 29/30 2.6 3.0 60.2% 61.2% 43.4% 43.8% 50.6% 54.3% 42.8%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5% 2012 1/1 0.0 0.0 80.0% 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% — 20.0% 28.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 4/4 5.3 6.3 52.3% 63.4% 47.3% 53.4% 39.7% 55.6% 41.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 5/8 1.8 2.4 59.9% 62.4% 47.5% 49.0% 51.4% 56.2% 43.7%
26 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0% 2016 39/41 2.1 2.6 56.4% 64.3% 45.3% 57.0% 48.6% 56.1% 43.1%
27 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8% 2017 61/61 2.1 2.3 61.2% 63.4% 47.9% 48.5% 54.1% 57.3% 45.3%
28 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0% 2018 62/66 3.0 2.2 60.8% 66.3% 47.8% 52.6% 50.3% 58.9% 46.2%
29 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8% 2019 48/49 2.5 2.0 58.8% 64.8% 50.3% 52.2% 46.3% 58.7% 44.1%
30 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3% 2020 10/10 2.4 2.3 60.0% 55.3% 43.1% 43.3% 31.6% 50.7% 37.0%
31 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2% 2021 33/35 1.9 2.8 59.4% 62.1% 46.7% 54.4% 52.0% 55.9% 44.3%
32 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5% 2022 3/3 2.7 2.7 64.0% 64.6% 38.9% 27.2% 34.9% 55.7% 41.1%
33 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6% 2024 6/6 1.2 1.5 69.3% 65.6% 49.5% 45.5% 53.6% 60.6% 49.9%
35 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5% 2025 19/20 2.3 3.2 65.5% 60.6% 40.7% 52.1% 38.7% 53.4% 41.0%
36 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1% — 369/387 2.3 2.6 60.1% 63.1% 46.7% 50.7% 49.1% 56.5% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Siegemund Anastasija Sevastova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1510 107.3 +0.28 -0.88 1.201 53.9% — — — 60.0% +1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1532 109.5 -0.95 -1.06 0.905 47.8% +22 -5 — 37.5% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.37
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1700 136.1 +0.52 +1.27 1.013 50.4% -18 -56 — 50.0% +0.10 10–4 (71%) 5–3 (63%) 112.0 -1.72
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1623 125.8 -0.67 -0.46 0.936 48.5% +20 -35 — 47.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 5–4 (56%) 93.7 -1.25
22 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 2012 1606 — -4.79 -0.63 0.357 26.3% — — — — — — — — -0.02
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1618 108.8 -1.89 -0.55 0.931 48.2% +29 — — 44.4% -0.56 1–0 1–0 — -0.36
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1651 116.6 -0.45 +1.55 0.997 49.7% +20 -58 — 63.2% +0.10 1–2 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 103.0 +0.37
26 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44 2016 1713 129.3 +0.55 -0.36 0.984 49.6% -12 -43 -134 53.9% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 104.2 -0.43
27 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28 2017 1821 142.6 +0.98 +2.00 1.060 51.3% -53 -13 -127 58.1% +0.59 9–7 (56%) 4–9 (31%) 102.4 +0.20
28 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49 2018 1918 151.6 +2.10 +3.32 1.125 52.4% -17 -8 -182 60.1% +0.74 17–7 (71%) 8–8 (50%) 106.2 -0.51
29 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87 2019 1759 136.0 +1.82 +0.39 1.068 51.1% -11 +149 0 56.8% +0.43 9–13 (41%) 6–5 (55%) 93.5 +2.29
30 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08 2020 1649 114.7 -2.98 -3.36 0.751 43.8% +22 — — 13.6% -2.27 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.12
31 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71 2021 1713 129.5 -0.41 +1.61 1.003 50.1% -94 +132 +101 50.0% +0.10 7–9 (44%) 5–7 (42%) 95.5 +0.39
32 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05 2022 1699 110.3 -1.74 +1.28 0.927 48.1% -77 — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.20
33 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72 2023 1698 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75 2024 1713 111.5 +0.69 +0.90 1.267 54.9% -42 — — 75.0% +1.75 — — — +0.34
35 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31 2025 1723 126.0 -2.14 -1.19 0.879 47.2% -3 +53 — 43.8% -0.58 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 104.0 -0.66
36 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05 2026 1677 90.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1749 132.0 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.76 — 1956 140.5 +0.50 +0.97 1.015 50.2% -21 +17 -80 52.8% +0.18 69–60 (53%) 45–45 (50%) 104.7 -0.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.