H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Anastasija Sevastova H2H: 1-2
Anastasija Sevastova holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anastasija Sevastova leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2019 Stuttgart fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2019* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-4 6-3 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2017* | Charleston | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Laura Siegemund | 6-2 6-4 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2016* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-3 6-2 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Anastasija Sevastova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |