H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Barbora Strycova H2H: 2-1

Laura Siegemund holds a 2–1 lead over Barbora Strycova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on clay, while Barbora Strycova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbora Strycova won the 2019 Wimbledon second round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Barbora Strycova
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbora Strycova #54 6-3 7-5 Laura Siegemund #82 Match data Jul 4, 2019* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Laura Siegemund #100 6-4 6-3 Barbora Strycova #26 Match data Apr 26, 2018* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Laura Siegemund #29 7-5 5-7 5-4 Barbora Strycova #21 Match data Oct 3, 2016 R64 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 288 300 49.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Barbora Strycova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 14–16 46.7% #57 1,560 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,488 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,476 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,455 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,523 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,583 0 1
28 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1
29 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2 2016 36–24 60.0% #20 1,788 0 1
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,869 0 2
32 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2 2018 24–23 51.1% #33 1,766 0 2
33 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,714 0 2
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2
36 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,600 0 2
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Siegemund Barbora Strycova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 8 10 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 5 11 16 31.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2012 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 19 14 33 57.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 2016 22 18 40 55.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
31 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 30 16 46 65.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
32 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2019 5 12 17 29.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
38 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0% — — — — — 164 175 339 48.4% 77 86 163 47.2% 46 36 82 56.1% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 485/587 of Barbora Strycova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Siegemund Barbora Strycova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 1.0 4.0 57.3% 57.8% 53.7% 56.3% 35.3% 56.1% 42.9%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/30 1.0 4.4 54.2% 63.7% 41.8% 48.3% 52.7% 53.8% 45.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/23 2.3 3.7 55.5% 53.2% 40.0% 42.9% 55.6% 47.5% 37.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 3/7 1.0 3.7 67.6% 55.3% 40.0% 61.6% 52.8% 50.3% 39.7%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5% 2008 13/14 1.5 1.6 70.6% 55.6% 41.6% 47.5% 42.6% 51.2% 42.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 24/33 1.0 2.1 68.2% 56.5% 46.4% 49.1% 49.5% 53.3% 41.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 36/38 1.5 1.9 66.1% 59.3% 47.9% 56.1% 43.5% 55.5% 43.7%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 46/50 1.6 1.7 65.6% 58.1% 45.4% 49.8% 53.5% 53.5% 44.3%
26 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0% 2012 30/34 2.2 2.6 63.3% 56.4% 41.9% 50.2% 51.0% 50.9% 42.0%
27 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8% 2013 7/11 2.4 2.7 65.0% 61.8% 45.8% 56.4% 54.5% 56.2% 41.1%
28 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0% 2014 42/52 2.4 2.7 60.7% 62.8% 46.2% 56.3% 47.1% 56.3% 41.1%
29 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8% 2015 45/57 2.2 2.6 62.8% 63.8% 49.0% 56.2% 50.8% 57.8% 43.0%
30 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3% 2016 55/60 2.4 2.2 66.8% 62.2% 48.0% 54.2% 52.3% 57.6% 45.7%
31 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2% 2017 66/66 2.2 2.1 65.7% 62.6% 47.3% 54.7% 53.0% 57.2% 46.7%
32 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5% 2018 45/47 2.0 3.0 64.1% 64.4% 48.2% 55.6% 48.1% 58.6% 43.1%
33 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6% 2019 39/39 1.7 2.6 64.2% 62.6% 48.2% 52.2% 41.8% 57.3% 42.8%
34 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6% 2020 14/14 1.4 2.3 68.0% 55.7% 51.2% 49.2% 46.7% 54.0% 41.1%
35 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5% 2021 2/2 0.0 4.0 64.6% 54.0% 36.8% 33.9% 28.6% 47.0% 39.3%
36 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3% 2023 9/9 2.6 3.2 61.0% 59.1% 45.6% 48.4% 51.5% 53.9% 42.4%
38 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1% — 485/588 2.0 2.4 64.8% 60.9% 46.8% 53.3% 49.3% 55.8% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Siegemund Barbora Strycova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1486 99.7 -1.59 +0.58 0.975 49.7% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1560 125.3 -0.39 +0.06 0.982 49.5% +6 +47 — 44.6% -0.23 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +0.54
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1488 101.4 -2.03 -2.32 0.722 43.0% -20 +118 — 38.9% -0.96 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +1.31
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1476 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.03
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1455 104.6 -1.82 -2.44 0.799 45.3% — +102 — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
22 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 2008 1513 108.9 -1.54 +0.34 0.872 46.8% -67 +39 +49 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.4 -0.68
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1523 111.3 -1.84 -2.43 0.894 47.3% -37 +41 +30 38.5% -0.94 8–4 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 -0.27
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1592 126.0 -0.57 -0.21 0.981 49.4% -74 +11 0 42.5% -0.22 6–5 (55%) 1–7 (13%) 99.2 -0.73
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1631 125.9 -1.85 +0.89 0.952 48.9% -4 -38 -72 45.6% -0.32 10–6 (63%) 7–7 (50%) 106.3 +0.05
26 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44 2012 1564 122.3 -2.92 -0.52 0.856 46.3% 0 +80 — 39.0% -0.84 5–6 (45%) 4–6 (40%) 97.6 -1.01
27 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28 2013 1584 113.7 -0.48 -1.63 0.938 48.6% -4 +37 — 44.0% -0.16 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.06
28 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49 2014 1750 131.4 +0.37 -1.53 0.940 48.6% -58 -180 +19 52.5% +0.01 11–5 (69%) 9–1 (90%) 113.9 -1.52
29 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87 2015 1710 133.4 -0.27 +1.56 1.019 50.5% +15 -127 +9 52.8% +0.37 6–7 (46%) 4–12 (25%) 94.5 -0.44
30 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08 2016 1788 148.3 +1.78 +2.95 1.078 51.5% -21 -76 +12 59.3% +0.56 10–8 (56%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -1.68
31 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71 2017 1870 145.4 +1.20 +3.47 1.090 51.8% +2 -113 -62 59.7% +0.62 10–8 (56%) 8–3 (73%) 101.9 -1.07
32 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05 2018 1766 138.7 +1.73 +0.59 1.042 50.7% -20 -44 +84 50.9% +0.05 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 93.8 +0.13
33 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72 2019 1715 131.2 +1.35 +0.33 1.004 50.0% -91 -3 +218 48.9% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 101.4 -0.77
34 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75 2020 1680 123.1 -1.62 -0.90 0.894 47.8% -51 +11 — 34.4% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.3 +0.18
35 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31 2021 1650 103.2 -2.95 -1.14 0.741 43.1% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — +0.07
36 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32 2023 1600 110.3 -1.50 -0.90 0.921 48.4% — +75 +313 28.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.10
38 2026 1749 132.0 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.76 — 1889 135.3 -0.01 +0.73 0.985 49.6% -21 -6 +60 47.9% -0.12 94–77 (55%) 63–73 (46%) 103.4 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.