H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Barbora Strycova H2H: 2-1
Laura Siegemund holds a 2–1 lead over Barbora Strycova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on clay, while Barbora Strycova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbora Strycova won the 2019 Wimbledon second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Barbora Strycova | 6-3 7-5 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2018* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Laura Siegemund | 6-4 6-3 | Barbora Strycova | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2016 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Laura Siegemund | 7-5 5-7 5-4 | Barbora Strycova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Barbora Strycova | #430 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,888 | 286 | 297 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Barbora Strycova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #57 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #137 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #151 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #66 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #89 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #25 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #33 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #37 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #430 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |