H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Camila Osorio H2H: 1-0

Laura Siegemund holds a 1–0 lead over Camila Osorio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2024 Morocco Open second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Camila Osorio
Colombia Age 24 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Siegemund #78 6-4 6-4 Camila Osorio #77 Match data May 23, 2024* R16 Morocco Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Camila Osorio #59 #33 1,354 1,826 104 96 52.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Camila Osorio
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #477 1,453 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2019 2–1 66.7% #207 1,487 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2021 18–12 60.0% #55 1,698 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2022 14–16 46.7% #80 1,689 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2023 17–15 53.1% #78 1,731 0 1
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 2024 18–17 51.4% #59 1,757 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 2025 20–17 54.1% #77 1,718 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 2026 15–17 46.9% #59 1,744 0 3
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2 — — — — — — —
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Siegemund Camila Osorio
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 7 12 41.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 9 9 18 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 7 8 15 46.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2024 7 10 17 41.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 11 12 23 47.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 8 12 20 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0% — 47 58 105 44.8% 52 25 77 67.5% 5 13 18 27.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 184/202 of Camila Osorio's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Siegemund Camila Osorio
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 2.0 4.0 60.0% 61.9% 32.1% 58.3% 28.6% 50.0% 36.9%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 3/3 1.3 7.0 57.8% 62.9% 46.8% 57.1% 41.6% 56.3% 47.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/30 1.4 5.3 63.1% 61.1% 38.4% 51.1% 49.0% 52.7% 48.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 30/31 1.2 4.1 68.6% 59.0% 40.9% 50.2% 44.0% 53.3% 44.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 32/32 0.7 5.3 64.2% 60.6% 42.3% 50.7% 40.1% 53.9% 44.9%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5% 2024 32/35 1.2 5.0 64.8% 58.9% 40.8% 49.3% 52.1% 52.4% 45.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 26/38 1.8 6.1 62.6% 61.7% 40.2% 54.1% 46.6% 53.8% 44.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 31/32 1.5 5.7 63.7% 62.3% 44.9% 50.3% 52.9% 55.7% 45.9%
26 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1% — 184/202 1.3 5.3 64.4% 60.6% 41.4% 51.0% 47.3% 53.7% 45.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Siegemund Camila Osorio
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1483 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1465 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1454 96.2 -0.76 -2.99 0.738 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1488 103.3 +0.83 +0.51 1.091 51.8% — +17 — 62.5% +0.75 1–1 0–1 — +0.10
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1483 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1699 120.1 -2.66 +3.25 1.014 50.4% -108 +13 -63 52.3% +0.08 7–0 (100%) 3–4 (43%) 107.0 -0.69
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1689 126.5 -2.72 +0.83 0.957 48.9% -8 +34 -184 48.3% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 9–7 (56%) 104.1 +0.85
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1731 132.4 -1.96 +1.86 0.974 49.5% -54 +87 -241 52.9% -0.04 6–2 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 106.3 -2.02
22 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 2024 1757 132.8 -3.36 +0.94 0.954 49.1% -66 +105 -187 53.8% +0.01 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 100.9 -0.70
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1719 136.8 -2.42 +1.16 0.969 49.3% -24 +106 — 51.7% +0.08 9–5 (64%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 -0.23
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1745 142.0 -1.22 +2.82 1.037 50.9% +16 +70 — 48.7% +0.10 6–7 (46%) 3–7 (30%) 97.1 -1.01
26 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1749 132.0 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.76 — 1826 136.1 -2.33 +1.77 0.984 49.7% -34 +69 -164 51.3% -0.01 37–27 (58%) 32–31 (51%) 106.7 -1.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.