H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Flavia Pennetta H2H: 0-1
Flavia Pennetta holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Flavia Pennetta leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Flavia Pennetta won the 2015 Marrakech fourth round 4-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015* | Marrakech | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Flavia Pennetta | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Flavia Pennetta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |