H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 2-0
Laura Siegemund holds a 2–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Siegemund leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2019 Stuttgart third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2021 | Doha | WTA 1000 | Q3 | Hard | Laura Siegemund | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2019* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Laura Siegemund | 6-2 6-2 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Apr 5, 2017* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Laura Siegemund | 6-7(6) 6-2 7-6(4) | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Lesia Tsurenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |