H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Mariana Duque-Mariño H2H: 0-1
Mariana Duque-Mariño holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mariana Duque-Mariño leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mariana Duque-Mariño won the 2016 Nurnberg fourth round 7-6(6) 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2016* | Nurnberg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Mariana Duque-Mariño | 7-6(6) 3-6 6-1 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mariana Duque-Mariño | #709 | #66 | 923 | 1,657 | 48 | 82 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Mariana Duque-Mariño | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #109 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #192 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,453 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,439 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #145 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,483 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,454 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #78 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #110 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #107 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |