H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 2-0

Laura Siegemund holds a 2–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Siegemund leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2016 Madrid Open second round 6-2 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Siegemund #44 6-2 3-6 6-3 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #74 Match data May 3, 2016* R32 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Laura Siegemund #75 7-5 6-2 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #74 Match data Apr 8, 2016* R16 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,676 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,768 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,753 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,599 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,595 0 2
20 — — — — — — — 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,545 0 2
21 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,524 0 2
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,537 0 2
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,518 0 2
28 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2
29 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,562 0 2
32 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3
33 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,633 0 3
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,625 0 3
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,699 0 3
36 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,690 0 3
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2 — — — — — — —
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Siegemund Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2014 11 4 15 73.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 12 18 30 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 5 11 16 31.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
35 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
36 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0% — — — — — 66 98 164 40.2% 49 42 91 53.8% 21 24 45 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 130/155 of Mirjana Lucic-Baroni's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Siegemund Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2% 2013 9/19 4.1 4.1 56.7% 68.4% 48.1% 53.6% 49.9% 59.4% 41.5%
32 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5% 2014 20/20 4.3 5.3 53.7% 68.8% 48.0% 62.8% 45.7% 59.1% 44.5%
33 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6% 2015 29/43 3.6 6.9 56.7% 63.3% 46.8% 46.1% 48.6% 56.4% 38.2%
34 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6% 2016 31/32 2.5 6.3 55.5% 65.0% 41.4% 44.4% 54.4% 54.7% 47.6%
35 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5% 2017 36/36 3.2 6.6 57.5% 64.6% 41.2% 51.9% 58.5% 54.6% 43.6%
36 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1% 2018 5/5 1.4 5.2 54.9% 60.4% 37.5% 48.1% 68.9% 50.9% 37.9%
37 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1% — 130/302 3.3 6.2 56.1% 65.1% 43.9% 50.4% 53.2% 55.9% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Siegemund Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1676 143.4 — — — — -116 +86 — 67.7% +1.23 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1769 134.7 — — — — -188 +120 — 52.6% +0.37 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +0.58
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1754 132.9 — — — — -144 — -16 45.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 107.0 -0.60
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1599 100.7 — — — — -42 +102 +114 19.4% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.6 -0.28
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1595 108.4 — — — — — +137 — 36.4% -0.27 1–0 0–1 — -0.02
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1545 104.2 — — — — -70 — — 20.0% -2.53 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.09
22 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1537 109.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.13
26 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28 2009 1518 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18
28 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49 2010 1554 111.8 — — — — -70 — +160 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.12
29 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87 2011 1551 110.1 — — — — -82 +119 +144 41.2% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 5–2 (71%) 100.3 -0.83
30 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08 2012 1535 107.2 — — — — -72 +122 +176 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +0.36
31 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71 2013 1562 122.6 +0.65 -0.89 1.023 51.1% -102 +80 +154 47.5% +0.25 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 95.1 -0.31
32 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05 2014 1707 129.5 +2.54 +0.56 1.087 51.8% -37 -115 — 59.5% +0.71 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 103.2 -0.45
33 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72 2015 1634 127.2 -1.64 -2.22 0.875 47.8% -4 -66 +47 43.0% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 2–10 (17%) 93.1 -0.40
34 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75 2016 1625 127.9 -1.32 +3.68 1.050 51.1% -46 +79 -10 47.9% +0.14 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85
35 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31 2017 1699 137.2 -0.69 +1.19 0.960 49.5% +14 +54 — 52.4% +0.08 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.6 -0.19
36 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05 2018 1690 108.4 -2.20 -1.43 0.772 44.8% +7 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 — +0.03
37 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1749 131.9 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.75 — 1799 132.5 -0.52 +0.68 0.977 49.8% -54 +70 +84 45.8% -0.27 51–50 (50%) 31–45 (41%) 97.4 -1.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.