H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Laura Siegemund holds a 3–1 lead over Patricia Maria Tig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Laura Siegemund leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2019 Hiroshima round of 16 6-2 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | 6-2 5-7 7-5 | Patricia Maria Tig | Match data | Sep 13, 2019* | R16 | Hiroshima | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Patricia Maria Tig | 6-3 6-1 | Laura Siegemund | Match data | Jul 20, 2019* | SF | Bucharest | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
| Laura Siegemund | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Patricia Maria Tig | Match data | Aug 31, 2016* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Laura Siegemund | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Patricia Maria Tig | Match data | Apr 6, 2016* | R64 | Charleston Open | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #102 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,852 | 145 | 154 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Patricia Maria Tig | #417 | #56 | 1,284 | 1,743 | 41 | 52 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #108 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #232 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #114 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #436 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #51 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #125 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 27 | 2015 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2023 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 66 | 83 | 149 | 44.3% | 69 | 56 | 125 | 55.2% | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | — | 21 | 28 | 49 | 42.9% | 19 | 21 | 40 | 47.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 86/90 of Patricia Maria Tig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7/9 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 66.4% | 60.7% | 49.6% | 63.7% | 63.0% | 57.9% | 44.1% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 19/19 | 1.9 | 6.6 | 58.4% | 60.6% | 43.5% | 52.1% | 43.8% | 53.4% | 42.6% |
| 22 | 2010 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 73.3% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 12.5% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 47.5% | 2017 | 11/13 | 0.8 | 4.0 | 55.1% | 57.8% | 42.5% | 43.5% | 28.3% | 51.4% | 38.3% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12/12 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 64.8% | 63.3% | 46.2% | 65.0% | 47.8% | 57.7% | 46.2% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 16/16 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 61.4% | 64.4% | 43.6% | 54.4% | 59.3% | 56.0% | 49.3% |
| 26 | 2014 | 3/3 | 3.3 | 8.0 | 63.6% | 61.4% | 44.0% | 61.0% | 54.8% | 55.3% | 49.0% | 2021 | 12/12 | 1.8 | 4.7 | 58.2% | 60.5% | 40.4% | 54.5% | 40.9% | 52.3% | 38.0% |
| 27 | 2015 | 8/12 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 70.8% | 58.6% | 50.3% | 47.6% | 51.3% | 55.8% | 47.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 43/48 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 71.0% | 59.9% | 46.9% | 51.7% | 50.6% | 56.1% | 46.0% | 2023 | 9/9 | 0.9 | 6.4 | 59.7% | 50.8% | 36.9% | 46.5% | 44.6% | 45.2% | 41.4% |
| 29 | 2017 | 24/25 | 1.1 | 4.5 | 69.0% | 58.7% | 42.8% | 57.5% | 45.1% | 53.7% | 46.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 19/20 | 1.1 | 3.9 | 66.0% | 59.6% | 47.9% | 49.6% | 54.3% | 55.6% | 45.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 35/35 | 1.1 | 3.7 | 68.9% | 59.9% | 48.7% | 53.5% | 42.0% | 56.5% | 41.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 19/19 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 68.5% | 61.3% | 46.8% | 52.7% | 43.6% | 56.7% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 20/22 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 70.1% | 56.1% | 49.0% | 51.7% | 47.4% | 53.9% | 40.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 10/10 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 70.1% | 58.4% | 45.6% | 50.7% | 39.2% | 54.8% | 37.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 23/24 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 75.3% | 62.5% | 44.7% | 59.6% | 49.4% | 58.0% | 42.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 32/34 | 0.7 | 3.4 | 73.1% | 56.6% | 44.4% | 51.6% | 50.4% | 53.3% | 47.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 21/28 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 74.1% | 60.5% | 42.3% | 54.9% | 43.0% | 55.6% | 44.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 19/20 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 75.0% | 59.2% | 46.8% | 52.5% | 41.4% | 56.1% | 42.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 277/301 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 71.0% | 59.3% | 46.1% | 53.1% | 46.9% | 55.4% | 44.1% | — | 86/93 | 1.4 | 5.0 | 60.2% | 60.3% | 43.1% | 53.9% | 46.5% | 53.6% | 43.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1532 | 106.0 | -1.09 | +1.08 | 1.048 | 50.8% | +14 | — | — | 52.9% | -0.29 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.85 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1527 | 104.9 | -1.75 | -1.01 | 0.914 | 48.2% | -21 | +55 | — | 44.7% | -0.62 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.3 | +0.41 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1483 | 96.8 | -2.49 | -3.75 | 0.712 | 41.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 | 2017 | 1501 | 110.1 | -3.01 | -2.64 | 0.788 | 44.5% | +29 | +16 | — | 30.4% | -1.48 | 0–1 | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.05 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1660 | 117.4 | -0.28 | +1.62 | 1.094 | 52.2% | -105 | +70 | — | 64.3% | +0.97 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.92 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1728 | 126.3 | -0.51 | +3.24 | 1.123 | 52.8% | -128 | +65 | — | 65.7% | +1.06 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +1.17 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1495 | 114.5 | +1.56 | +0.48 | 1.094 | 52.5% | — | +47 | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.44 | 2021 | 1626 | 106.9 | -1.94 | -2.64 | 0.797 | 45.6% | -63 | +83 | -83 | 34.6% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 95.9 | -0.48 |
| 27 | 2015 | 1530 | 113.4 | -1.13 | +2.65 | 1.082 | 51.4% | +25 | 0 | — | 44.0% | -0.24 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.0 | -0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 1747 | 132.7 | +0.58 | +2.35 | 1.047 | 51.0% | -100 | +75 | -189 | 56.9% | +0.36 | 11–4 (73%) | 3–5 (38%) | 106.8 | -0.49 | 2023 | 1534 | 106.6 | -5.52 | -1.65 | 0.756 | 43.5% | +4 | — | — | 28.6% | -2.19 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.1 | +0.11 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1796 | 129.1 | -1.81 | +3.46 | 1.011 | 50.2% | -247 | +119 | — | 53.3% | +0.10 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–7 (42%) | 94.0 | -1.87 | 2024 | 1554 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 1693 | 118.6 | -0.34 | +1.50 | 1.020 | 50.5% | -147 | +85 | — | 48.7% | +0.23 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–2 | — | -1.08 | 2025 | 1469 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +59 | — | 42.9% | -0.28 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.05 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1667 | 125.7 | +0.15 | -0.92 | 0.946 | 48.8% | -73 | +57 | — | 43.2% | -0.45 | 6–5 (55%) | 1–4 (20%) | 100.0 | -0.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 1789 | 142.4 | +0.10 | +1.20 | 1.003 | 50.0% | -78 | +22 | — | 52.3% | +0.30 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–2 | — | -1.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 1732 | 132.3 | -1.05 | -1.02 | 0.881 | 47.5% | +5 | +47 | -144 | 40.4% | -0.75 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.6 | -0.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 1655 | 117.5 | -0.88 | -0.51 | 0.831 | 46.6% | +18 | +81 | — | 25.0% | -1.25 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 1801 | 135.1 | +1.10 | -0.24 | 1.012 | 50.5% | +3 | — | — | 53.4% | +0.31 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–3 (50%) | 103.4 | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 1740 | 133.5 | -2.46 | +2.44 | 1.008 | 50.2% | +19 | -18 | — | 53.2% | +0.16 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–5 (55%) | 97.1 | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 1804 | 133.6 | -0.54 | +1.20 | 0.998 | 49.8% | -13 | -162 | -31 | 49.2% | -0.29 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–5 (44%) | 98.8 | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 1749 | 132.0 | +0.15 | -0.46 | 0.964 | 49.2% | -22 | -29 | -39 | 42.9% | -0.41 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–7 (30%) | 97.9 | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1852 | 137.5 | -0.42 | +1.03 | 0.989 | 49.8% | -45 | +46 | -90 | 49.0% | -0.07 | 55–51 (52%) | 30–46 (39%) | 95.4 | -2.76 | — | 1743 | 115.2 | -1.84 | -0.19 | 0.930 | 48.5% | -28 | +59 | -83 | 47.1% | -0.38 | 10–16 (38%) | 13–9 (59%) | 98.4 | +3.20 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina-Camelia Begu | 5 | 1 | 6 | Apr 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Liudmila Samsonova | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jan 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 26, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 13, 2019 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 3, 2020 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 30, 2021 | H2H |
| Danka Kovinic | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Anastasija Sevastova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 19, 2019 | H2H |