H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Laura Siegemund holds a 1–0 lead over Riya Bhatia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2021 Bad Homburg Open first round 2-6 7-6(2) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | 2-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | Riya Bhatia | Match data | Jun 23, 2021* | R32 | Bad Homburg Open | WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #102 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,852 | 145 | 154 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Riya Bhatia | #468 | #338 | 151 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Riya Bhatia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #436 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #51 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #125 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Riya Bhatia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1480 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 1483 | 96.8 | -2.49 | -3.75 | 0.712 | 41.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 | 2020 | 1464 | 93.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1404 | 91.2 | -2.04 | -2.29 | 0.837 | 46.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1376 | 87.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 1495 | 114.5 | +1.56 | +0.48 | 1.094 | 52.5% | — | +47 | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 1530 | 113.4 | -1.13 | +2.65 | 1.082 | 51.4% | +25 | 0 | — | 44.0% | -0.24 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.0 | -0.28 | 2025 | 1375 | 92.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 1747 | 132.7 | +0.58 | +2.35 | 1.047 | 51.0% | -100 | +75 | -189 | 56.9% | +0.36 | 11–4 (73%) | 3–5 (38%) | 106.8 | -0.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 1796 | 129.1 | -1.81 | +3.46 | 1.011 | 50.2% | -247 | +119 | — | 53.3% | +0.10 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–7 (42%) | 94.0 | -1.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 1693 | 118.6 | -0.34 | +1.50 | 1.020 | 50.5% | -147 | +85 | — | 48.7% | +0.23 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–2 | — | -1.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 1667 | 125.7 | +0.15 | -0.92 | 0.946 | 48.8% | -73 | +57 | — | 43.2% | -0.45 | 6–5 (55%) | 1–4 (20%) | 100.0 | -0.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 1789 | 142.4 | +0.10 | +1.20 | 1.003 | 50.0% | -78 | +22 | — | 52.3% | +0.30 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–2 | — | -1.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 1732 | 132.3 | -1.05 | -1.02 | 0.881 | 47.5% | +5 | +47 | -144 | 40.4% | -0.75 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.6 | -0.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 1655 | 117.5 | -0.88 | -0.51 | 0.831 | 46.6% | +18 | +81 | — | 25.0% | -1.25 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 1801 | 135.1 | +1.10 | -0.24 | 1.012 | 50.5% | +3 | — | — | 53.4% | +0.31 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–3 (50%) | 103.4 | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 1740 | 133.5 | -2.46 | +2.44 | 1.008 | 50.2% | +19 | -18 | — | 53.2% | +0.16 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–5 (55%) | 97.1 | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 1804 | 133.6 | -0.54 | +1.20 | 0.998 | 49.8% | -13 | -162 | -31 | 49.2% | -0.29 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–5 (44%) | 98.8 | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 1749 | 132.0 | +0.15 | -0.46 | 0.964 | 49.2% | -22 | -29 | -39 | 42.9% | -0.41 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–7 (30%) | 97.9 | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1852 | 137.5 | -0.42 | +1.03 | 0.989 | 49.8% | -45 | +46 | -90 | 49.0% | -0.07 | 55–51 (52%) | 30–46 (39%) | 95.4 | -2.76 | — | 1500 | 85.4 | -2.04 | -2.29 | 0.837 | 46.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -10.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina-Camelia Begu | 5 | 1 | 6 | Apr 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Liudmila Samsonova | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jan 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 26, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 23, 2021 | H2H |