H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:17 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Sara Bejlek H2H: 1-1
Laura Siegemund and Sara Bejlek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on clay, while Sara Bejlek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Bejlek won the 2026 Eastbourne third round 3-6 7-6(2) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 20
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Sara Bejlek | 3-6 7-6(2) 7-6(3) | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| May 6, 2026 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Laura Siegemund | 6-4 6-4 | Sara Bejlek | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Sara Bejlek | #42 | #34 | 1,380 | 1,864 | 18 | 22 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Sara Bejlek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #42 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |