H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lauren Davis vs Ana Konjuh H2H: 2-0

Lauren Davis holds a 2–0 lead over Ana Konjuh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lauren Davis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lauren Davis won the 2017 ASB Classic final 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lauren Davis
United States Age 32 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Ana Konjuh
Croatia Age 28 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lauren Davis #61 6-3 6-1 Ana Konjuh #47 Match data Jan 7, 2017* F ASB Classic International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lauren Davis #70 2-6 6-2 6-2 Ana Konjuh #259 Match data Jan 3, 2014* R16 ASB Classic International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lauren Davis #499 #26 1,646 1,837 143 182 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ana Konjuh #647 #20 1,830 1,786 84 81 50.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lauren Davis Ana Konjuh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2014 8–6 57.1% #93 1,611 0 0
17 2011 0–3 0.0% #319 1,469 0 0 2015 11–9 55.0% #82 1,656 0 1
18 2012 4–6 40.0% #91 1,496 0 0 2016 19–14 57.6% #47 1,683 0 1
19 2013 13–17 43.3% #70 1,575 0 0 2017 22–18 55.0% #44 1,716 0 1
20 2014 21–20 51.2% #55 1,654 0 0 2018 1–3 25.0% #385 1,688 0 1
21 2015 13–21 38.2% #88 1,579 0 0 2019 0–1 0.0% #1282 1,645 0 1
22 2016 15–9 62.5% #61 1,699 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2017 20–22 47.6% #50 1,624 0 1 2021 17–14 54.8% #67 1,690 0 1
24 2018 2–6 25.0% #173 1,603 0 1 2022 6–13 31.6% #108 1,647 0 1
25 2019 9–12 42.9% #64 1,733 0 1 2023 0–2 0.0% #407 1,587 0 1
26 2020 5–9 35.7% #75 1,622 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2021 12–16 42.9% #89 1,646 0 1 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,464 0 1
28 2022 13–17 43.3% #87 1,714 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2023 14–16 46.7% #68 1,682 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2024 0–5 0.0% #270 1,625 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2025 2–3 40.0% #362 1,592 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lauren Davis Ana Konjuh
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 2011 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
18 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 12 7 19 63.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7%
20 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2016 15 6 21 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 14 13 27 51.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2021 9 8 17 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2018 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2023 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2022 6 8 14 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2023 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 97 113 210 46.2% 25 41 66 37.9% 21 28 49 42.9% — 49 49 98 50.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 16 11 27 59.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 304/325 of Lauren Davis's and 156/165 of Ana Konjuh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lauren Davis Ana Konjuh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 14/14 5.4 5.8 53.2% 68.0% 43.3% 47.2% 39.0% 56.7% 40.4%
17 2011 3/3 0.7 3.0 49.5% 55.1% 40.4% 46.3% 16.7% 47.3% 23.6% 2015 17/20 3.2 3.8 58.4% 65.2% 50.4% 56.8% 59.7% 58.7% 44.3%
18 2012 10/10 1.0 2.2 66.5% 59.2% 48.6% 48.5% 36.9% 55.6% 42.9% 2016 28/33 3.9 5.1 53.6% 70.2% 45.2% 57.5% 47.1% 58.3% 43.6%
19 2013 23/30 0.7 2.6 62.6% 56.8% 42.6% 49.6% 41.8% 51.6% 39.9% 2017 40/40 3.6 4.7 57.7% 67.7% 44.6% 52.8% 52.3% 57.9% 43.3%
20 2014 38/41 0.8 2.9 63.1% 60.7% 42.4% 47.5% 42.8% 54.0% 42.8% 2018 4/4 3.8 3.0 62.5% 57.0% 35.7% 58.3% 24.2% 48.3% 40.7%
21 2015 29/34 1.0 4.4 64.0% 63.0% 46.0% 43.8% 54.2% 56.8% 40.7% 2019 1/1 3.0 8.0 42.6% 76.9% 42.9% 25.0% 0.0% 57.4% 27.9%
22 2016 19/24 1.6 2.9 59.7% 62.9% 44.5% 51.5% 50.5% 55.7% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 41/42 1.4 5.6 60.5% 59.3% 40.8% 50.4% 56.0% 52.1% 47.6% 2021 31/31 3.9 7.4 59.0% 62.8% 42.4% 54.1% 48.3% 54.4% 44.9%
24 2018 8/8 1.5 6.3 59.3% 57.6% 37.5% 54.0% 48.6% 49.5% 41.6% 2022 18/19 4.5 5.7 57.5% 64.9% 39.5% 51.1% 36.4% 53.9% 39.7%
25 2019 21/21 1.6 3.4 61.4% 60.2% 48.6% 60.3% 50.7% 55.7% 41.3% 2023 2/2 4.0 5.5 54.5% 67.3% 41.9% 67.7% 14.3% 55.7% 29.4%
26 2020 14/14 1.4 1.7 66.5% 57.2% 45.3% 49.9% 52.1% 53.2% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 28/28 1.9 3.0 55.3% 63.8% 44.5% 46.1% 45.0% 55.1% 42.0% 2025 1/1 0.0 8.0 42.6% 60.9% 48.4% 42.9% 33.3% 53.7% 36.4%
28 2022 30/30 2.1 3.4 56.8% 64.4% 42.8% 50.4% 50.5% 54.9% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2023 30/30 1.6 3.4 61.1% 61.0% 45.3% 48.1% 52.8% 54.9% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 5/5 0.6 3.0 56.6% 48.9% 39.4% 44.0% 51.9% 43.5% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 5/5 0.8 1.6 57.8% 48.9% 44.0% 47.2% 43.9% 47.3% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 304/325 1.4 3.5 60.8% 60.5% 43.8% 49.3% 48.9% 53.9% 42.7% — 156/165 3.9 5.4 56.8% 66.3% 43.9% 53.7% 46.7% 56.5% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lauren Davis Ana Konjuh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1611 123.8 +0.22 -1.66 0.933 48.3% -10 — +44 47.4% -0.24 8–2 (80%) 1–1 — -0.76
17 2011 1469 96.1 -1.99 -3.92 0.448 35.8% +25 — — 0.0% -3.83 — 0–1 — +0.06 2015 1657 117.4 +0.42 +1.27 1.073 51.6% -67 -102 +82 52.3% +0.14 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.20
18 2012 1497 108.5 -1.41 -0.02 0.967 49.1% +2 +46 — 42.9% -0.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.28 2016 1684 123.8 +2.55 +0.13 1.047 51.1% +5 -132 -1 58.0% +0.39 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.1 +1.16
19 2013 1576 111.7 -3.39 -2.88 0.824 45.7% +11 -54 -36 40.6% -1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 108.1 -0.03 2017 1716 135.7 +1.25 +0.51 1.028 50.5% -10 -157 +78 54.1% +0.13 9–6 (60%) 8–5 (62%) 104.6 -0.34
20 2014 1654 126.2 -1.49 -0.23 0.930 48.3% -1 -154 +33 51.1% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 105.7 +0.07 2018 1688 106.6 -1.09 +0.29 0.789 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — -0.10
21 2015 1580 117.4 -0.82 -0.57 0.941 48.6% -2 -59 +76 36.0% -1.15 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 -1.82 2019 1646 96.7 -2.44 -2.78 0.654 42.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — 0.00
22 2016 1699 128.3 -1.36 +1.29 1.023 50.4% +49 — — 57.1% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.7 -0.31 2020 1622 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 1624 128.1 -3.03 +3.62 0.995 50.0% +63 -69 -64 47.4% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 +0.39 2021 1691 127.3 -0.62 +0.89 0.985 49.7% +1 -22 — 52.8% +0.03 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 102.0 -0.51
24 2018 1603 108.4 -2.94 -0.71 0.824 45.7% +42 — — 30.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.10 2022 1647 126.6 -1.90 -1.85 0.861 46.8% +43 -54 — 36.4% -0.91 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -1.32
25 2019 1734 133.2 -0.71 -1.22 0.932 48.8% -2 -166 -55 43.2% -0.39 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 103.3 -0.90 2023 1587 109.7 -2.35 -4.08 0.664 42.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
26 2020 1623 118.4 -2.04 -0.34 0.923 48.3% +39 — — 40.6% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.17 2024 1554 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 1646 122.0 -1.24 -0.82 0.936 48.4% -3 -115 +89 42.6% -0.66 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.59 2025 1465 98.2 +2.05 -0.61 0.785 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
28 2022 1715 129.3 -1.29 -0.08 0.947 48.7% -7 -84 -9 42.4% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.0 -1.24 2026 1446 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2023 1682 126.0 -1.26 -0.82 0.950 48.9% +20 -11 -71 50.7% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 100.9 -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 1625 96.9 -3.79 -3.39 0.631 39.9% — — — 9.1% -3.18 0–1 0–1 — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 1593 110.2 -1.83 -2.46 0.794 44.6% +38 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1838 128.2 -1.76 -0.15 0.925 48.3% +20 -77 +9 43.9% -0.54 53–48 (52%) 39–29 (57%) 108.1 -1.56 — 1786 128.7 +0.44 +0.04 0.982 49.6% -3 -88 +62 50.3% -0.09 35–23 (60%) 21–15 (58%) 109.5 -1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.