H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Lea Antonoplis vs Adriana Villagran Reami H2H: 1-0
Lea Antonoplis holds a 1–0 lead over Adriana Villagran Reami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1984 Sydney second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 1984* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Lea Antonoplis | 6-4 6-4 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,774 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lea Antonoplis | Adriana Villagran Reami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,413 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,432 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |