H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Anna Maria Fernandez H2H: 1-0

Lea Antonoplis holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Maria Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1987 Tokyo Japan Open round of 32 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Anna Maria Fernandez
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis #182 7-5 6-1 Anna Maria Fernandez Match data Apr 17, 1987* R32 Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Anna Maria Fernandez — — — 1,688 54 97 35.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Anna Maria Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1978 10–4 71.4% — 1,687 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1979 0–6 0.0% — 1,612 0 0
19 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0 1980 4–9 30.8% — 1,554 0 1
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1 1981 6–5 54.5% — 1,605 0 1
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1982 9–10 47.4% — 1,591 0 1
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2 1983 9–21 30.0% — 1,545 0 1
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2 1984 2–9 18.2% — 1,475 0 1
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2 1985 2–5 28.6% — 1,474 0 1
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2 1986 2–7 22.2% — 1,429 0 1
26 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2 1987 8–16 33.3% — 1,425 0 1
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2 1988 2–5 28.6% — 1,436 0 1
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Anna Maria Fernandez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1980 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 4 9 13 30.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1984 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1985 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 30 48 78 38.5% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 22 33 33.3% 3 13 16 18.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Anna Maria Fernandez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92 1978 1687 135.4 — — — — +100 — — 62.1% +1.17 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 105.7 +0.59
18 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95 1979 1612 103.7 — — — — +111 — — 20.0% -2.07 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.23
19 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83 1980 1554 106.6 — — — — +41 — — 35.7% -1.18 0–2 1–0 — -0.06
20 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98 1981 1605 123.3 — — — — +17 -62 — 54.2% +0.38 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.57
21 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54 1982 1592 105.5 — — — — +38 — — 43.5% -0.44 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 105.6 +1.95
22 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94 1983 1546 106.9 — — — — +30 — -17 33.8% -1.43 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 101.7 +1.01
23 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13 1984 1475 95.9 — — — — +13 +57 — 33.3% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.33
24 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41 1985 1474 101.5 — — — — -34 — +70 29.4% -0.88 2–1 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 99.4 +0.89
25 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44 1986 1429 89.4 — — — — -52 — +118 26.3% -1.53 0–1 0–1 — +1.46
26 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18 1987 1426 93.3 — — — — -32 — +103 33.3% -1.15 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 +3.04
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87 1988 1436 107.4 — — — — -53 — +66 26.7% -2.40 1–0 1–1 — -0.18
28 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50 — 1689 109.9 — — — — +24 -3 +58 37.5% -0.91 18–21 (46%) 22–19 (54%) 103.2 +6.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.