H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Marita Redondo H2H: 0-3

Marita Redondo holds a 3–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marita Redondo leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marita Redondo won the 1978 San Diego Futures semifinal 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Marita Redondo
USA Age 70

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marita Redondo 7-6 6-2 Lea Antonoplis Match data Jan 7, 1978* SF San Diego Futures WTA 250 Hard
Marita Redondo 6-3-4-6-6-1 Lea Antonoplis Match data Jan 9, 1975* R32 Portland WTA 250 Carpet
Marita Redondo 6-0 2-6 7-6 Lea Antonoplis Match data May 10, 1973* SF Los Angeles Socal Chps WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Marita Redondo — — — 1,917 141 118 54.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Marita Redondo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1969 5–1 83.3% — 1,569 0 1
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 1970 11–4 73.3% — 1,623 0 3
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 1971 3–3 50.0% — 1,640 0 3
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 1972 24–4 85.7% — 1,802 0 7
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1973 29–16 64.4% — 1,869 0 8
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,772 0 8
19 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0 1975 11–13 45.8% — 1,694 0 8
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1 1976 16–17 48.5% — 1,786 0 8
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,770 0 8
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2 1978 24–17 58.5% — 1,840 0 9
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2 1979 11–19 36.7% — 1,758 0 9
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2 1980 5–14 26.3% — 1,668 0 9
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2 1981 0–4 0.0% — 1,616 0 9
26 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Marita Redondo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1971 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 10 0 10 100.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 6 17 64.7%
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 12 5 17 70.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 9 10 19 47.4%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1980 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1981 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 52 30 82 63.4% 11 14 25 44.0% 20 17 37 54.1% 51 54 105 48.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Marita Redondo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1569 113.8 — — — — +113 — — 83.3% +2.42 — — — +1.54
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 1970 1623 120.3 — — — — +139 — — 68.8% +1.94 2–2 (50%) — — +3.88
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 1971 1640 107.8 — — — — — — -49 46.7% -0.13 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.5 0.00
16 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22 1972 1802 133.1 — — — — +121 -257 -90 81.7% +2.48 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 105.3 +4.95
17 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92 1973 1870 133.0 — — — — +64 -267 -112 61.6% +0.75 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 104.6 +0.62
18 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95 1974 1772 96.7 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -1.25 0–2 — — +0.90
19 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83 1975 1694 119.8 — — — — +67 -82 — 44.6% -0.52 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — +0.26
20 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98 1976 1787 148.6 — — — — +68 -175 — 50.0% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 106.1 -0.32
21 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54 1977 1771 99.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09
22 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94 1978 1841 142.3 — — — — +37 — -99 55.6% +0.12 8–4 (67%) 8–1 (89%) 109.6 +0.70
23 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13 1979 1758 138.4 — — — — +44 — -49 35.9% -1.28 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.7 -0.59
24 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41 1980 1669 116.9 — — — — +2 — — 28.6% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -1.03
25 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44 1981 1616 96.7 — — — — +15 — — 0.0% -3.63 — 0–1 — +0.39
26 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50 — 1917 138.7 — — — — +61 -189 -88 53.0% +0.20 41–25 (62%) 23–12 (66%) 113.7 +4.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.