H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 0-1

Patricia Medrado holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Medrado leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1978 San Antonio round of 32 6-2 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Patricia Medrado
BRA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Medrado 6-2 3-6 6-2 Lea Antonoplis Match data Sep 14, 1978* R32 San Antonio WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Patricia Medrado #359 #67 9 1,836 152 163 48.3% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Patricia Medrado
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,535 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,517 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,527 0 1
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1978 6–11 35.3% — 1,582 0 1
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,599 0 1
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,647 0 4
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 1981 38–20 65.5% — 1,738 0 8
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 1982 33–25 56.9% — 1,778 0 10
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 1983 4–18 18.2% — 1,576 0 10
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 1984 11–15 42.3% #108 1,588 0 10
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1985 8–14 36.4% #108 1,542 0 10
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 1986 12–14 46.2% #76 1,561 0 10
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 1987 6–13 31.6% #117 1,550 0 10
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 1988 4–11 26.7% #180 1,473 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Patricia Medrado
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1978 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1980 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1982 2 6 8 25.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 25 49 74 33.8% 84 75 159 52.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 3 21 24 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Patricia Medrado
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 1975 1535 102.4 — — — — — +33 — 75.0% +1.25 — — — +1.01
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 1976 1517 92.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.02
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1977 1528 97.0 — — — — +38 — — 33.3% -2.22 0–1 1–0 — +0.68
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1978 1582 115.6 — — — — +3 -32 — 36.6% -1.05 5–2 (71%) — — -0.14
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 1979 1600 122.4 — — — — -32 +22 — 40.9% -1.45 1–3 (25%) 5–0 (100%) 102.1 -0.16
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 1980 1647 127.0 — — — — — -68 — 64.9% +1.30 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +0.78
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 1981 1739 134.1 — — — — -124 -50 — 63.3% +1.20 7–7 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 96.5 +2.58
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 1982 1779 140.8 — — — — -197 +94 — 56.6% +0.45 6–11 (35%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 -1.37
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 1983 1577 104.0 — — — — -93 +205 — 24.0% -1.80 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.53
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 1984 1588 120.4 — — — — -112 +162 — 48.3% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–3 (63%) 95.2 +0.36
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 1985 1542 114.5 — — — — -92 +100 — 39.1% -0.22 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.78
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 1986 1562 123.2 — — — — -82 +112 — 49.2% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +1.15
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 1987 1551 107.8 — — — — -107 +50 — 39.1% -0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.0 +0.64
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 1988 1473 104.6 — — — — -66 +64 — 31.4% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +1.44
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1837 128.4 — — — — -99 +60 — 49.5% +0.04 36–57 (39%) 36–29 (55%) 95.0 +2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.