H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Robin White H2H: 1-0

Lea Antonoplis holds a 1–0 lead over Robin White in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1981 Berkeley round of 16 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Robin White
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis 6-4 7-5 Robin White Match data May 3, 1981* R16 Berkeley WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Robin White #565 #15 37 1,878 142 158 47.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Robin White
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1982 2–1 66.7% — 1,518 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 1983 1–4 20.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1984 5–10 33.3% #105 1,495 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1985 25–18 58.1% #32 1,763 0 1
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 1986 23–19 54.8% #16 1,789 0 1
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 1987 11–14 44.0% #56 1,742 0 1
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,765 0 1
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 1989 9–15 37.5% #88 1,688 0 1
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 1990 15–15 50.0% #59 1,710 0 1
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 1991 7–14 33.3% #101 1,636 0 1
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1992 13–14 48.1% #56 1,622 0 2
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 1993 4–12 25.0% #119 1,568 0 2
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 1994 1–3 25.0% #281 1,539 0 2
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Robin White
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1985 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — 8 6 14 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0%
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1987 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1988 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1990 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0%
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 73 86 159 45.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 39 34 73 53.4% 27 34 61 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Robin White
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 1981 1505 105.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — -0.06
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 1982 1518 105.9 — — — — +74 — — 71.4% +1.57 0–1 — — +0.70
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 1983 1493 101.2 — — — — — — +63 30.8% -1.31 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.29
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1984 1495 103.9 — — — — +20 — +91 38.9% -0.67 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +1.14
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1985 1763 139.2 — — — — -10 — -118 55.8% +0.51 10–8 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 106.8 +0.41
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 1986 1789 138.4 — — — — -24 -221 -17 51.0% -0.15 11–5 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.9 -1.55
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 1987 1743 140.4 — — — — -18 — +37 51.7% -0.10 0–8 (0%) 4–3 (57%) 90.6 -1.00
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 1988 1766 136.0 — — — — -10 — +22 56.9% +0.51 8–10 (44%) 8–4 (67%) 99.8 +1.25
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 1989 1689 131.2 — — — — -9 — +56 45.0% -0.12 3–9 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 89.5 -0.91
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 1990 1711 133.3 — — — — -36 — +99 50.0% -0.01 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.1 -0.04
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 1991 1636 120.4 — — — — -47 — +163 34.8% -1.02 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 +0.47
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 1992 1622 126.4 — — — — -14 — +161 47.6% -0.02 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 99.7 +1.71
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 1993 1568 127.2 — — — — -40 — +234 33.3% -1.03 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 97.1 -0.72
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 1994 1540 105.6 — — — — -31 — — 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — +0.68
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1879 138.5 — — — — -18 -221 +31 48.7% -0.06 47–65 (42%) 31–33 (48%) 95.5 +0.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.