H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Lea Antonoplis vs Robin White H2H: 1-0
Lea Antonoplis holds a 1–0 lead over Robin White in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1981 Berkeley fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1981* | Berkeley | WTA 250 | R16 | — | Lea Antonoplis | 6-4 7-5 | Robin White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,774 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lea Antonoplis | Robin White | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,413 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,432 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |