H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 0-1

Yvonne Vermaak holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yvonne Vermaak leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yvonne Vermaak won the 1979 Beckenham quarterfinal 6-2 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Yvonne Vermaak
RSA Age 69 Right-Handed 155 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yvonne Vermaak 6-2 2-6 6-3 Lea Antonoplis Match data Jun 9, 1979* QF Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Yvonne Vermaak — #38 10 1,892 239 250 48.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Yvonne Vermaak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 1973 0–2 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,489 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1975 15–12 55.6% — 1,599 0 0
19 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0 1976 8–10 44.4% — 1,606 0 1
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1 1977 20–14 58.8% — 1,765 0 2
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1978 29–23 55.8% — 1,794 0 2
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2 1979 15–23 39.5% — 1,781 0 2
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2 1980 19–19 50.0% — 1,735 0 2
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2 1981 19–28 40.4% — 1,720 0 2
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2 1982 36–27 57.1% — 1,821 0 2
26 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2 1983 33–26 55.9% — 1,755 0 4
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2 1984 29–28 50.9% #41 1,801 0 5
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1985 8–21 27.6% — 1,605 0 5
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2 1986 6–11 35.3% #104 1,565 0 5
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2 1987 1–3 25.0% #201 1,558 0 5
31 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2 1988 0–1 0.0% #287 1,542 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Yvonne Vermaak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1974 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
19 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1977 3 2 5 60.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1978 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 9 11 18.2%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1980 2 5 7 28.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1981 7 9 16 43.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 10 20 50.0%
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1983 14 4 18 77.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 9 13 30.8%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 12 7 19 63.2% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 72 64 136 52.9% 78 72 150 52.0% 55 44 99 55.6% 33 69 102 32.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Yvonne Vermaak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22 1973 1496 101.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 — — -0.39
17 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92 1974 1489 99.2 — — — — +43 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.69
18 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95 1975 1599 120.1 — — — — +53 -2 -47 57.1% +0.46 3–6 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +2.23
19 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83 1976 1607 119.9 — — — — -10 +39 — 48.8% +0.09 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.77
20 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98 1977 1766 138.3 — — — — -80 -80 -75 58.1% +0.41 3–3 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 102.5 -0.04
21 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54 1978 1794 135.9 — — — — +3 -135 -32 52.6% +0.33 8–6 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 99.2 +2.36
22 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94 1979 1781 155.4 — — — — -43 -75 +23 40.5% -0.50 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.0 -4.15
23 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13 1980 1735 137.1 — — — — -93 +40 +57 51.2% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.6 -4.28
24 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41 1981 1720 144.0 — — — — -67 +97 — 43.1% -0.39 4–6 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -2.56
25 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44 1982 1821 143.1 — — — — -78 +69 -9 55.2% +0.06 11–10 (52%) 9–10 (47%) 99.9 -2.99
26 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18 1983 1755 138.2 — — — — +8 +105 +98 55.4% +0.20 10–11 (48%) 7–3 (70%) 100.1 +1.01
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87 1984 1801 135.0 — — — — -65 -14 +95 53.1% +0.15 5–11 (31%) 7–8 (47%) 94.0 -0.27
28 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66 1985 1605 125.4 — — — — +12 +115 +210 37.7% -0.97 1–10 (9%) 0–1 — -0.88
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65 1986 1566 105.2 — — — — +20 +85 +195 36.8% -0.87 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.31
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77 1987 1559 108.1 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.38 — — — -0.55
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 1988 1542 94.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.11
Career — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50 — 1893 142.0 — — — — -34 +34 +34 50.0% -0.06 55–80 (41%) 41–47 (47%) 93.2 -1.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.