H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lea Pericoli vs Miroslava Holubova H2H: 1-0
Lea Pericoli holds a 1–0 lead over Miroslava Holubova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Pericoli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1971 Rome fourth round 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1971* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Lea Pericoli | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Miroslava Holubova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Pericoli | — | — | — | 1,764 | 58 | 51 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Miroslava Holubova | — | — | — | 1,639 | 23 | 32 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lea Pericoli | Miroslava Holubova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1968 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1969 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1970 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,747 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1973 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1974 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1975 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |