H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Lele Forood vs Leslie Allen H2H: 1-1
Lele Forood and Leslie Allen are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leslie Allen leads 1–0 on grass, while Lele Forood leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leslie Allen won the 1981 Eastbourne second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1981* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Leslie Allen | 6-2 6-4 | Lele Forood | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1979* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Lele Forood | 7-6 6-1 | Leslie Allen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lele Forood | — | — | — | 1,684 | 54 | 96 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Leslie Allen | — | — | — | 1,911 | 87 | 121 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lele Forood | Leslie Allen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1975 | 4–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1977 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |