H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Lele Forood vs Pam Casale H2H: 0-1

Pam Casale holds a 1–0 lead over Lele Forood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1981 Charleston Open round of 32 7-6 6-4.

H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Casale 7-6 6-4 Lele Forood Match data Apr 9, 1981* R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lele Forood — — — 1,682 55 97 36.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pam Casale — #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lele Forood Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 1974 3–1 75.0% — 1,514 0 0 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,811 0 0
18 1975 4–0 100.0% — 1,573 0 1 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,746 0 0
19 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,575 0 1 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1977 4–11 26.7% — 1,553 0 1 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1978 4–9 30.8% — 1,613 0 1 1985 24–20 54.5% — 1,815 0 0
22 1979 9–19 32.1% — 1,637 0 1 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,788 0 0
23 1980 12–16 42.9% — 1,637 0 1 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 1981 4–10 28.6% — 1,593 0 1 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1982 5–9 35.7% — 1,567 0 1 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1983 8–16 33.3% — 1,554 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,526 0 0
27 1984 1–3 25.0% — 1,525 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lele Forood Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1975 — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 27 39 30.8% 20 33 53 37.7% 16 21 37 43.2% 4 14 18 22.2% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lele Forood Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1481 92.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1477 101.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.13 1980 1598 118.8 — — — — +31 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.08
17 1974 1514 108.8 — — — — — — +84 70.0% +2.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.81 1981 1811 140.6 — — — — -1 -153 -195 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +2.45
18 1975 1574 116.6 — — — — — +19 — 88.9% +3.67 1–0 — — +1.14 1982 1746 140.5 — — — — -55 -5 -107 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.6 -2.94
19 1976 1575 102.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 1–0 — +0.32 1983 1771 144.3 — — — — -54 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.30
20 1977 1553 117.3 — — — — +73 -21 — 32.4% -1.12 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.53 1984 1915 155.4 — — — — +5 -61 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -3.10
21 1978 1614 126.7 — — — — +34 — -23 37.5% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -1.91 1985 1815 137.8 — — — — +80 -55 -189 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.03
22 1979 1638 136.4 — — — — -17 -51 -18 36.5% -0.71 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 -1.32 1986 1788 137.2 — — — — -55 +53 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.8 -3.60
23 1980 1638 120.3 — — — — -89 -71 +26 43.8% -0.64 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.9 -1.01 1987 1674 114.3 — — — — -20 — -78 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.56
24 1981 1593 118.2 — — — — -35 +1 +56 31.0% -0.76 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.28 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +26 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.02
25 1982 1568 115.7 — — — — -58 -16 — 35.5% -1.23 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.8 +0.53 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.23
26 1983 1554 109.7 — — — — -26 -11 +102 33.3% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 +0.61 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
27 1984 1526 92.2 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1683 126.6 — — — — -21 -26 +45 38.5% -0.81 23–22 (51%) 10–19 (34%) 97.3 +0.44 — 1945 143.6 — — — — +2 +5 -154 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.