H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lesia Tsurenko vs Angelique Kerber H2H: 0-3
Angelique Kerber holds a 3–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Angelique Kerber leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Angelique Kerber won the 2019 Madrid second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2019 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Angelique Kerber | 6-3 6-2 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2015* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Angelique Kerber | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,045 | 461 | 270 | 63.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Angelique Kerber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 54–16 | 77.1% | #1 | 2,024 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,767 | 2 | 10 |
| 30 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #2 | 1,924 | 3 | 12 |
| 31 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,800 | 3 | 12 |
| 32 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,764 | 3 | 12 |
| 33 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,933 | 3 | 13 |
| 34 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,878 | 3 | 14 |
| 35 | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #205 | 1,788 | 3 | 14 |