H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lesia Tsurenko vs Caroline Wozniacki H2H: 1-1
Lesia Tsurenko and Caroline Wozniacki are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2018 US Open second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 6-4 6-2 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Caroline Wozniacki | 6-4 6-3 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 |
| 24 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 |
| 26 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 |
| 27 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 |
| 30 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 |
| 33 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 |
| 34 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |