H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lesia Tsurenko vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 2-2

Lesia Tsurenko and Ekaterina Makarova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ekaterina Makarova leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Lesia Tsurenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2018 Cincinnati Open third round 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Ekaterina Makarova
RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lesia Tsurenko #44 7-6(5) 6-2 Ekaterina Makarova #49 Match data Aug 17, 2018* R16 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lesia Tsurenko #42 6-2 6-2 Ekaterina Makarova #40 Match data Jun 1, 2017* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Ekaterina Makarova #31 3-6 6-4 6-3 Lesia Tsurenko #46 Match data Mar 25, 2016* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Ekaterina Makarova #49 7-6(6) 6-1 Lesia Tsurenko #157 Match data Jan 21, 2011* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,942 252 225 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Ekaterina Makarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0
20 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0
21 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0
22 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,663 0 1
23 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,606 0 1
24 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1
25 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,836 0 1
26 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,840 0 2
27 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,794 0 2
28 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3 2016 27–21 56.2% #30 1,776 0 2
29 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,840 0 3
30 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,756 0 3
31 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,707 0 3
32 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Ekaterina Makarova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 9 13 22 40.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
21 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2009 7 14 21 33.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 6 14 20 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
23 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 9 15 24 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 17 12 29 58.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 30 15 45 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 18 9 27 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2017 21 14 35 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2018 12 13 25 48.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1% — — — — — 165 149 314 52.5% 45 46 91 49.5% 42 28 70 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's and 442/477 of Ekaterina Makarova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Ekaterina Makarova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 2.3 2.5 66.4% 54.5% 37.8% 48.4% 66.9% 48.3% 39.8%
20 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6% 2008 30/37 2.6 2.5 60.2% 62.5% 44.2% 40.5% 45.0% 55.1% 43.0%
21 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6% 2009 39/41 2.2 4.0 58.6% 64.0% 40.9% 48.2% 50.2% 54.2% 43.9%
22 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4% 2010 31/34 2.5 2.1 59.6% 59.5% 47.6% 57.5% 52.7% 54.8% 41.5%
23 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7% 2011 36/38 2.5 2.4 60.5% 64.0% 43.2% 47.4% 47.1% 55.6% 39.4%
24 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8% 2012 45/45 2.1 2.0 62.9% 64.9% 50.6% 55.1% 49.3% 59.5% 43.6%
25 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5% 2013 41/42 2.9 2.1 64.4% 66.3% 47.4% 57.6% 50.6% 59.3% 45.1%
26 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8% 2014 56/60 2.6 2.1 64.0% 65.1% 47.7% 59.9% 44.7% 58.9% 45.0%
27 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5% 2015 36/42 2.1 1.8 66.0% 65.8% 54.1% 55.9% 53.9% 61.6% 43.2%
28 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4% 2016 40/48 2.5 2.8 65.6% 65.1% 47.3% 58.4% 53.6% 59.0% 42.4%
29 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0% 2017 47/48 2.9 2.9 65.5% 64.2% 45.5% 52.2% 45.3% 57.7% 43.3%
30 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8% 2018 34/35 2.4 4.1 64.4% 63.8% 43.6% 56.6% 44.0% 56.6% 41.5%
31 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8% 2019 3/3 3.3 3.0 67.3% 61.0% 43.4% 52.0% 36.3% 55.6% 38.7%
32 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7% — 442/477 2.5 2.6 63.2% 64.2% 46.6% 54.0% 48.7% 57.6% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Ekaterina Makarova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1536 118.3 +1.82 -0.84 0.769 44.4% +21 — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 — — -0.12
20 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15 2008 1626 124.1 -0.08 -0.65 0.958 48.7% -33 -52 +24 46.5% -0.34 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 102.4 -0.55
21 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08 2009 1634 131.6 -1.02 +0.38 0.960 49.1% -45 +48 +32 47.4% -0.49 7–8 (47%) 7–0 (100%) 107.5 -0.92
22 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34 2010 1663 122.5 -0.26 -1.13 0.918 48.3% -104 -64 +173 45.5% -0.53 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 98.1 -2.59
23 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05 2011 1606 131.9 +0.66 -2.66 0.887 47.4% -47 +70 +141 40.9% -0.75 6–6 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 101.5 -1.38
24 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31 2012 1758 146.6 +3.45 +1.31 1.076 51.4% -30 -80 +28 57.1% +0.51 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) 96.8 -2.49
25 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32 2013 1836 145.0 +3.78 +1.69 1.108 52.2% -22 -149 -40 59.3% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 -1.08
26 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25 2014 1841 150.2 +3.13 +1.93 1.095 51.8% +1 -157 +25 60.2% +0.56 11–2 (85%) 5–6 (45%) 106.8 -1.18
27 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38 2015 1795 142.0 +3.14 +1.65 1.125 52.5% +49 -71 +5 64.8% +0.89 4–7 (36%) 5–1 (83%) 98.0 +1.69
28 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57 2016 1776 140.5 +2.86 -0.13 1.035 50.8% +17 -78 +71 55.0% +0.41 8–9 (47%) 3–2 (60%) 96.7 +0.36
29 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69 2017 1841 148.6 +1.78 +0.54 1.022 50.2% +18 -103 -20 52.7% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 104.6 -2.16
30 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24 2018 1757 140.7 +0.52 -0.09 0.957 49.2% +11 -59 +62 45.8% -0.40 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 101.3 -2.54
31 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91 2019 1707 109.2 -2.16 -1.63 0.871 47.4% +6 — — 25.0% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — 0.00
32 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84 — 1942 146.2 +1.78 +0.38 1.014 50.2% -11 -55 +51 52.5% +0.08 72–73 (50%) 49–43 (53%) 104.0 -2.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.