Lesia Tsurenko
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simona Halep | 0 | 8 | 8 | Jun 16, 2022 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 16, 2022 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 3, 2018 | H2H |
| Varvara Lepchenko | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 28, 2024 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Jana Cepelova holds a 1–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Cepelova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jana Cepelova won the 2013 Brussels round of 32 5-7 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Cepelova | 5-7 6-3 7-5 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data | May 23, 2013* | R32 | Brussels | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | #386 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,898 | 180 | 202 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,671 | 55 | 92 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Jana Cepelova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #108 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #27 | 1,808 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,765 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Jana Cepelova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 20 | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2011 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2015 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 2012 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2016 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 2013 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2017 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 22.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 25 | 2014 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2018 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2019 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 122 | 127 | 249 | 49.0% | 34 | 48 | 82 | 41.5% | 24 | 27 | 51 | 47.1% | — | 29 | 59 | 88 | 33.0% | 19 | 23 | 42 | 45.2% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's and 141/147 of Jana Cepelova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Jana Cepelova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 86.4% | 50.9% | 11.1% | 53.8% | 25.0% | 45.5% | 40.4% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 9/10 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 66.5% | 58.4% | 44.1% | 49.8% | 44.8% | 53.6% | 45.4% |
| 20 | 2009 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 67.3% | 54.3% | 41.2% | 55.6% | 16.7% | 50.0% | 38.6% | 2013 | 21/21 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 64.1% | 54.6% | 39.5% | 44.2% | 52.4% | 49.4% | 42.5% |
| 21 | 2010 | 4/4 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 61.0% | 59.3% | 41.5% | 45.5% | 53.9% | 52.3% | 39.6% | 2014 | 36/37 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 67.6% | 56.9% | 44.2% | 52.4% | 51.9% | 53.1% | 45.6% |
| 22 | 2011 | 10/10 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 66.1% | 57.8% | 37.4% | 47.0% | 48.7% | 50.7% | 44.4% | 2015 | 12/15 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 69.0% | 51.6% | 43.2% | 43.7% | 42.8% | 48.3% | 40.4% |
| 23 | 2012 | 17/19 | 0.6 | 6.3 | 61.4% | 56.3% | 38.9% | 40.3% | 55.0% | 49.7% | 45.7% | 2016 | 21/21 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 64.5% | 59.8% | 43.9% | 45.0% | 50.4% | 54.1% | 43.3% |
| 24 | 2013 | 27/29 | 1.3 | 5.2 | 61.6% | 59.8% | 45.0% | 44.2% | 53.6% | 54.0% | 45.8% | 2017 | 28/29 | 1.0 | 2.9 | 62.6% | 60.1% | 38.9% | 43.3% | 43.7% | 52.2% | 42.9% |
| 25 | 2014 | 12/12 | 2.3 | 5.6 | 58.7% | 59.9% | 45.7% | 52.5% | 41.0% | 54.5% | 42.5% | 2018 | 7/7 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 64.5% | 58.3% | 43.6% | 51.6% | 51.1% | 53.2% | 42.9% |
| 26 | 2015 | 31/39 | 1.5 | 4.3 | 69.1% | 63.2% | 53.5% | 55.0% | 49.7% | 59.5% | 44.8% | 2019 | 6/6 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 62.5% | 54.9% | 37.2% | 24.8% | 54.2% | 46.8% | 44.3% |
| 27 | 2016 | 35/39 | 1.6 | 5.0 | 64.8% | 60.5% | 44.8% | 50.5% | 53.2% | 54.9% | 45.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 44/46 | 1.6 | 4.1 | 65.6% | 61.5% | 44.4% | 49.1% | 52.0% | 55.6% | 45.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 41/45 | 1.8 | 4.5 | 64.4% | 61.8% | 46.5% | 54.0% | 47.5% | 56.2% | 46.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 28/28 | 1.6 | 3.3 | 69.7% | 59.1% | 43.8% | 51.0% | 54.3% | 54.4% | 44.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 3/4 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 65.0% | 53.6% | 42.6% | 35.2% | 43.8% | 50.0% | 42.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 16/16 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 65.8% | 55.1% | 43.1% | 45.6% | 55.2% | 51.2% | 49.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 19/21 | 0.3 | 3.2 | 64.4% | 53.7% | 43.8% | 49.8% | 49.2% | 49.9% | 45.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 37/40 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 66.2% | 57.5% | 43.0% | 47.8% | 54.7% | 52.7% | 50.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 28/30 | 0.2 | 4.9 | 63.5% | 55.1% | 40.2% | 47.0% | 46.8% | 49.5% | 43.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 353/383 | 1.1 | 4.3 | 65.1% | 59.1% | 44.4% | 49.2% | 51.1% | 53.9% | 45.7% | — | 141/147 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 65.4% | 57.2% | 41.7% | 46.2% | 48.8% | 51.8% | 43.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Jana Cepelova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1486 | 97.3 | +0.56 | -1.05 | 0.740 | 43.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.07 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1535 | 104.0 | +0.24 | +0.88 | 0.978 | 49.6% | -13 | — | +117 | 43.5% | -0.39 | 3–0 (100%) | 1–2 (33%) | 103.5 | +0.42 |
| 20 | 2009 | 1483 | 96.1 | -0.16 | -0.74 | 0.771 | 43.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 | 2013 | 1511 | 109.4 | -5.00 | -1.81 | 0.840 | 45.9% | -15 | +25 | +91 | 35.4% | -1.19 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 102.3 | +0.41 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1468 | 101.2 | -1.44 | -1.76 | 0.831 | 46.3% | — | +62 | — | 25.0% | -1.88 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.08 | 2014 | 1599 | 124.4 | -2.47 | +1.17 | 0.972 | 49.3% | -50 | +49 | — | 48.8% | -0.24 | 6–6 (50%) | 6–2 (75%) | 105.4 | +0.63 |
| 22 | 2011 | 1468 | 104.4 | -3.16 | -0.61 | 0.900 | 47.5% | +23 | +64 | — | 23.5% | -1.41 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.34 | 2015 | 1575 | 106.4 | -3.91 | -1.07 | 0.783 | 44.6% | -70 | +65 | — | 35.3% | -1.18 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.6 | -1.09 |
| 23 | 2012 | 1485 | 109.3 | -4.45 | +0.03 | 0.909 | 47.7% | 0 | +73 | — | 40.9% | -0.71 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 102.4 | +0.05 | 2016 | 1632 | 123.6 | -1.51 | +0.12 | 0.945 | 48.8% | -32 | -37 | -17 | 44.9% | -0.35 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.0 | -1.31 |
| 24 | 2013 | 1505 | 119.0 | -1.69 | +1.15 | 0.995 | 49.9% | +10 | -7 | +46 | 40.6% | -0.36 | 4–6 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.5 | +0.31 | 2017 | 1627 | 118.6 | -2.44 | -0.29 | 0.898 | 47.4% | -28 | -13 | -11 | 32.8% | -1.11 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.2 | -1.67 |
| 25 | 2014 | 1510 | 105.5 | -1.40 | -0.49 | 0.933 | 48.6% | -11 | — | — | 36.7% | -0.70 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.7 | +0.32 | 2018 | 1626 | 119.0 | -1.48 | -0.41 | 0.915 | 48.0% | +7 | — | — | 38.9% | -0.72 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | -0.49 |
| 26 | 2015 | 1721 | 139.7 | +1.11 | +2.63 | 1.105 | 52.2% | +8 | — | -177 | 59.3% | +0.80 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–5 (55%) | 102.2 | +0.25 | 2019 | 1619 | 111.1 | -2.22 | +0.48 | 0.832 | 45.4% | +46 | -54 | — | 27.3% | -1.36 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.45 |
| 27 | 2016 | 1725 | 125.5 | -0.94 | +1.32 | 1.009 | 50.2% | +25 | -190 | -217 | 50.6% | +0.07 | 7–3 (70%) | 3–6 (33%) | 103.6 | +1.38 | 2020 | 1567 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 1689 | 134.1 | -0.08 | +2.63 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +20 | -134 | -107 | 47.9% | -0.10 | 5–7 (42%) | 7–6 (54%) | 100.9 | -1.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 1808 | 142.9 | -0.18 | +2.84 | 1.051 | 51.2% | +2 | -219 | -158 | 60.4% | +0.77 | 8–3 (73%) | 5–3 (63%) | 106.6 | +0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 1736 | 136.2 | -1.34 | +1.80 | 0.981 | 49.5% | +99 | -130 | -117 | 46.6% | -0.22 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.6 | -0.24 | 2023 | 1546 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 1767 | 118.5 | +0.32 | +2.54 | 0.856 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 42.9% | -1.14 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 1746 | 128.4 | -2.98 | +2.74 | 1.009 | 50.1% | +22 | — | — | 43.8% | -0.44 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 1766 | 127.9 | -3.73 | +2.57 | 0.901 | 47.5% | -41 | -82 | -3 | 57.5% | +0.18 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.9 | -1.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 1870 | 139.4 | -2.54 | +6.34 | 1.063 | 51.5% | -23 | -32 | -93 | 62.0% | +0.68 | 7–2 (78%) | 3–1 (75%) | 107.3 | -1.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 1697 | 119.9 | -5.55 | +0.83 | 0.866 | 46.6% | +16 | +33 | — | 41.4% | -0.93 | 4–4 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1898 | 136.0 | -1.67 | +2.21 | 0.991 | 49.8% | +13 | -65 | -90 | 49.5% | -0.03 | 56–47 (54%) | 36–36 (50%) | 105.0 | -0.84 | — | 1671 | 120.4 | -2.57 | -0.05 | 0.905 | 47.7% | -30 | +17 | +41 | 40.0% | -0.75 | 23–26 (47%) | 19–14 (58%) | 104.7 | -2.37 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simona Halep | 0 | 8 | 8 | Jun 16, 2022 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 16, 2022 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 3, 2018 | H2H |
| Varvara Lepchenko | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annika Beck | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 23, 2017 | H2H |
| Elena Vesnina | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 24, 2016 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 2, 2019 | H2H |
| Simona Halep | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 30, 2017 | H2H |
| Andrea Petkovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 23, 2017 | H2H |