H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lesia Tsurenko vs Magdalena Rybarikova H2H: 1-1

Lesia Tsurenko and Magdalena Rybarikova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lesia Tsurenko leads 1–0 on clay, while Magdalena Rybarikova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2018 Roland Garros third round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Magdalena Rybarikova
Slovak Republic Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lesia Tsurenko #39 6-2 6-4 Magdalena Rybarikova #18 Match data Jun 2, 2018* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Magdalena Rybarikova #87 6-2 6-1 Lesia Tsurenko #35 Match data Jul 9, 2017* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Magdalena Rybarikova #199 #17 2,405 1,816 188 209 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Magdalena Rybarikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #342 1,515 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #231 1,491 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 9–9 50.0% #59 1,567 0 0
20 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0 2009 27–26 50.9% #44 1,694 0 1
21 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0 2010 12–21 36.4% #106 1,583 0 1
22 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0 2011 14–14 50.0% #71 1,607 0 2
23 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0 2012 13–16 44.8% #62 1,604 0 3
24 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0 2013 29–22 56.9% #37 1,739 0 4
25 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0 2014 20–26 43.5% #50 1,691 0 4
26 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1 2015 16–22 42.1% #80 1,608 0 4
27 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2 2016 6–7 46.2% #154 1,656 0 4
28 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3 2017 19–11 63.3% #20 1,793 0 4
29 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4 2018 16–22 42.1% #48 1,668 0 4
30 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4 2019 5–9 35.7% #176 1,604 0 4
31 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Magdalena Rybarikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 17 18 35 48.6% 4 7 11 36.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
21 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2010 6 11 17 35.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 22 14 36 61.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 15 18 33 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 10 16 26 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2017 10 8 18 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
29 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2018 8 14 22 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
30 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2019 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1% — — — — — 123 132 255 48.2% 25 47 72 34.7% 39 28 67 58.2% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's and 363/393 of Magdalena Rybarikova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Magdalena Rybarikova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 5.5 59.1% 56.0% 30.9% 60.0% 41.7% 45.3% 40.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 13/18 3.4 3.6 60.5% 66.1% 46.3% 55.9% 60.8% 58.4% 45.3%
20 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6% 2009 46/53 3.7 4.0 58.8% 64.9% 43.5% 52.9% 49.3% 56.0% 42.7%
21 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6% 2010 32/33 4.3 2.7 59.0% 64.9% 43.4% 44.4% 43.2% 55.9% 40.8%
22 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4% 2011 27/28 4.6 3.7 53.1% 69.6% 48.3% 57.0% 42.5% 59.5% 42.1%
23 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7% 2012 25/29 3.6 2.3 53.9% 66.3% 42.2% 52.5% 55.8% 55.1% 44.3%
24 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8% 2013 49/51 2.9 3.1 56.7% 65.1% 42.5% 51.1% 49.4% 55.1% 44.6%
25 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5% 2014 45/46 3.1 2.3 58.8% 62.6% 46.3% 55.1% 42.7% 55.9% 41.1%
26 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8% 2015 31/38 3.4 2.6 60.4% 64.8% 48.5% 49.4% 50.0% 58.7% 40.5%
27 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5% 2016 12/13 4.6 3.8 54.2% 63.0% 40.9% 57.0% 47.0% 52.9% 40.3%
28 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4% 2017 30/30 3.8 2.1 57.2% 66.5% 44.9% 55.5% 51.5% 57.4% 44.2%
29 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0% 2018 37/38 3.3 2.4 57.2% 66.1% 46.5% 52.9% 48.3% 57.6% 42.3%
30 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8% 2019 14/14 3.4 2.6 57.1% 63.4% 45.2% 55.4% 43.0% 55.7% 35.2%
31 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7% — 363/397 3.6 2.9 57.5% 65.2% 44.8% 52.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Magdalena Rybarikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1515 103.4 — — — — — +33 — 50.0% +0.30 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.12
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1491 95.9 -3.33 -1.31 0.740 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.10
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1568 122.6 +0.91 -0.05 1.089 51.6% -13 +17 — 55.9% +0.79 1–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.60
20 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15 2009 1694 132.9 +0.77 -0.53 0.971 49.4% -18 -136 +36 48.0% -0.26 13–8 (62%) 7–5 (58%) 107.5 -0.63
21 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08 2010 1583 120.0 +0.50 -2.50 0.926 48.2% +35 -79 +136 38.7% -0.72 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) 92.3 -1.41
22 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34 2011 1608 121.7 +2.01 -1.24 1.040 50.8% +32 -135 +113 52.5% +0.49 6–5 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 96.8 +0.48
23 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05 2012 1604 117.5 -0.46 -0.72 0.986 49.9% +27 -127 — 47.5% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 +0.36
24 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31 2013 1739 135.3 -0.28 +0.80 0.993 50.0% +32 -307 -38 55.9% +0.32 11–6 (65%) 7–7 (50%) 105.7 +0.82
25 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32 2014 1691 127.1 +0.14 -1.62 0.932 48.4% +14 -239 +3 45.4% -0.52 7–8 (47%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 -1.04
26 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25 2015 1609 119.9 +0.16 -0.43 0.980 49.6% -9 -135 +81 40.5% -0.61 5–4 (56%) 3–9 (25%) 97.9 +0.28
27 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38 2016 1657 123.3 -1.07 -1.08 0.856 47.0% +10 — -5 46.2% -0.73 4–2 (67%) 1–0 — -0.81
28 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57 2017 1794 139.4 +1.44 +1.79 1.038 51.1% -39 — +22 60.0% +0.44 5–1 (83%) 5–4 (56%) 106.1 -1.73
29 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69 2018 1668 129.9 +1.21 -0.59 0.998 49.6% -31 -170 +141 46.3% -0.15 5–7 (42%) 2–2 (50%) 98.8 +0.32
30 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24 2019 1605 113.4 -1.48 -4.35 0.794 45.6% +54 — +173 36.7% -1.17 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.23
31 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84 — 1816 132.8 +0.42 -0.68 0.971 49.4% +7 -121 +61 47.9% -0.18 69–54 (56%) 38–51 (43%) 100.2 -0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.