H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lesia Tsurenko vs Mandy Minella
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Lesia Tsurenko vs Mandy Minella.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
LUX
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mandy Minella | #787 | #66 | 955 | 1,644 | 58 | 102 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Mandy Minella | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #110 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #77 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #168 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #262 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |