H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Edda Buding holds a 2–0 lead over Lesley Hunt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Edda Buding leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Edda Buding won the 1968 Hamburg Open round of 32 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edda Buding | 6-4 6-2 | Lesley Hunt | Match data | Aug 9, 1968* | R32 | Hamburg Open | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Edda Buding | 6-4 11-9 | Lesley Hunt | Match data | Jun 15, 1968* | QF | Lugano | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,949 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Edda Buding | — | — | — | 1,694 | 33 | 27 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Edda Buding | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,920 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,931 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,875 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,764 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 21–11 | 65.6% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Edda Buding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1968 | 1596 | 113.5 | — | — | — | — | — | -6 | -6 | 53.1% | +0.37 | 10–6 (63%) | — | — | +0.86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 1732 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | -21 | -73 | -38 | 57.6% | +0.31 | 8–6 (57%) | — | — | -0.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 1921 | 143.0 | — | — | — | — | -94 | -42 | -67 | 66.7% | +1.30 | 7–6 (54%) | 0–1 | — | -2.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 1833 | 139.1 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -38 | +13 | 56.7% | +0.48 | 7–10 (41%) | 7–1 (88%) | 100.1 | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 1906 | 147.2 | — | — | — | — | +108 | -126 | -9 | 60.0% | +0.86 | 10–6 (63%) | 1–1 | — | -7.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 1871 | 154.6 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -156 | +78 | 51.9% | +0.24 | 2–10 (17%) | 6–8 (43%) | 90.2 | -5.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 1932 | 150.2 | — | — | — | — | -12 | -224 | +81 | 57.6% | +0.57 | 8–7 (53%) | 5–7 (42%) | 100.2 | -5.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 1875 | 148.5 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -153 | +98 | 46.0% | -0.02 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.9 | -4.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 1848 | 147.0 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -51 | +125 | 55.9% | +0.39 | 5–7 (42%) | 3–3 (50%) | 95.3 | -4.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 1783 | 132.1 | — | — | — | — | — | -4 | +124 | 43.6% | -0.67 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.6 | -1.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 1828 | 138.3 | — | — | — | — | -18 | -111 | +85 | 48.9% | -0.10 | 11–6 (65%) | 3–6 (33%) | 99.9 | -3.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 1765 | 115.9 | — | — | — | — | -38 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | — | — | — | -0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1623 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | +67 | -2 | -55 | 63.4% | +1.03 | 4–3 (57%) | — | — | +0.55 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1675 | 120.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | 61.8% | +0.53 | 3–3 (50%) | — | — | -0.21 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1618 | 106.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +32 | -74 | 26.3% | -1.95 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.73 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1629 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.14 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.52 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1615 | 100.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.04 |
| Career | — | 1950 | 146.0 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -66 | +19 | 55.1% | +0.39 | 75–71 (51%) | 31–32 (49%) | 99.7 | -6.89 | — | 1695 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | +67 | +10 | -65 | 54.9% | +0.29 | 8–7 (53%) | 0–2 | — | -1.47 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosie Casals | 1 | 17 | 18 | Apr 13, 1978 | H2H |
| Francoise Durr | 4 | 14 | 18 | Mar 26, 1976 | H2H |
| Margaret Court | 0 | 17 | 17 | Feb 13, 1975 | H2H |
| Kerry Reid | 7 | 7 | 14 | Apr 13, 1979 | H2H |
| Billie Jean King | 0 | 13 | 13 | Jan 19, 1978 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judy Tegart | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 4, 1972 | H2H |
| Frances Maclennan | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 20, 1968 | H2H |
| Kerry Reid | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 30, 1972 | H2H |
| Cecilia Martinez | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jan 29, 1972 | H2H |
| Helen Gourlay | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 17, 1971 | H2H |