H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Marita Redondo H2H: 2-2
Lesley Hunt and Marita Redondo are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marita Redondo leads 2–1 on carpet, while Lesley Hunt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1979 Houston third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 1979* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Lesley Hunt | 6-3 6-4 | Marita Redondo | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1978* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 7-5 6-4 | Marita Redondo | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1976* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marita Redondo | 5-7 7-5 (ret.) | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Mar 5, 1976* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Marita Redondo | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Marita Redondo | — | — | — | 1,905 | 136 | 118 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Marita Redondo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 24–4 | 85.7% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 29–16 | 64.4% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |