H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lesley Turner vs Janet Newberry H2H: 1-0
Lesley Turner holds a 1–0 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lesley Turner leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lesley Turner won the 1971 Haverford quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 83
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1971* | Haverford | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Lesley Turner | 7-5 6-4 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Turner | — | — | — | 1,912 | 144 | 76 | 65.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Turner | Janet Newberry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1968 | 48–22 | 68.6% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1969 | 55–22 | 71.4% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1971 | 20–12 | 62.5% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1973 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |