H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Leslie Allen vs Beverly Mould H2H: 0-1

Beverly Mould holds a 1–0 lead over Leslie Allen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beverly Mould leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Beverly Mould won the 1984 Newport round of 32 6-3 6-1.

USA Age 69 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
RSA Age 64 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Beverly Mould 6-3 6-1 Leslie Allen Match data Aug 2, 1984* R32 Newport WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leslie Allen 1,886 87 122 41.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Beverly Mould #46 #46 1,666 32 46 41.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leslie Allen Beverly Mould
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1980 1–1 50.0% 1,504 0 0
19 1981 7–7 50.0% 1,520 0 0
20 1977 0–2 0.0% 1,487 0 0 1982 6–6 50.0% 1,574 0 0
21 1978 0–3 0.0% 1,458 0 0 1983 5–6 45.5% 1,599 0 0
22 1979 6–11 35.3% 1,540 0 0 1984 10–14 41.7% #46 1,647 0 0
23 1980 12–20 37.5% 1,609 0 0 1985 3–12 20.0% 1,536 0 0
24 1981 27–23 54.0% 1,774 0 1
25 1982 25–22 53.2% 1,819 0 1
26 1983 12–17 41.4% 1,775 0 1
27 1984 2–14 12.5% 1,574 0 1
28 1985 1–4 20.0% 1,553 0 1
29 1986 2–4 33.3% 1,524 0 1
30 1987 0–2 0.0% 1,507 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leslie Allen Beverly Mould
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1980 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1980 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 1985 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1981 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5%
25 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 12 10 22 54.5%
26 1983 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
27 1984 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1985 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 12 31 43 27.9% 16 24 40 40.0% 25 24 49 51.0% 33 41 74 44.6% 10 17 27 37.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 15 27 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leslie Allen Beverly Mould
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1980 1505 99.2 50.0% -0.25 +0.23
19 1981 1521 115.2 53.3% +0.83 0–2 0–6 (0%) +1.08
20 1977 1488 100.2 33.3% -0.50 0–2 +0.04 1982 1575 120.3 +20 +30 55.2% -0.04 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) +0.29
21 1978 1458 96.5 0.0% -2.25 +0.35 1983 1600 117.3 +18 +52 47.8% -0.30 0–1 1–0 +0.31
22 1979 1540 122.9 +64 +4 36.8% -1.10 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.3 +0.67 1984 1647 123.3 -41 -1 41.8% -0.45 4–3 (57%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 +0.37
23 1980 1610 121.7 -87 -40 -63 39.2% -0.90 5–7 (42%) 5–1 (83%) 104.7 -1.93 1985 1537 101.2 -37 +81 25.7% -1.51 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.7 +0.96
24 1981 1774 141.2 -88 -136 -74 52.1% 0.00 11–8 (58%) 6–3 (67%) 106.9 -2.47
25 1982 1820 139.6 -122 -220 +3 51.0% +0.08 7–5 (58%) 5–7 (42%) 103.8 -1.82
26 1983 1776 129.9 -40 -140 +39 43.9% -0.89 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.80
27 1984 1574 92.3 +9 +43 +139 16.7% -2.42 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 -0.10
28 1985 1554 99.8 +28 20.0% -2.80 -0.17
29 1986 1524 100.2 +34 37.5% -0.56 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) 97.4 +0.79
30 1987 1507 104.8 0.0% -2.25 0–1 -0.10
Career 1886 132.1 -61 -70 -14 42.5% -0.64 34–33 (51%) 22–26 (46%) 103.8 -2.68 1667 120.3 -28 +34 +25 43.8% -0.35 7–13 (35%) 9–12 (43%) 94.1 +4.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.