H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Leslie Allen vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 1-0
Leslie Allen holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Tanvier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leslie Allen leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leslie Allen won the 1982 Wimbledon first round 6-4 4-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 69
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Leslie Allen | 6-4 4-6 8-6 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leslie Allen | — | — | — | 1,911 | 87 | 121 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leslie Allen | Catherine Tanvier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |