H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Leslie Allen vs Kate Latham H2H: 3-1

Leslie Allen holds a 3–1 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Leslie Allen leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Leslie Allen won the 1982 Brisbane International round of 64 2-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Leslie Allen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 74

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leslie Allen 2-6 6-2 6-3 Kate Latham Match data Nov 17, 1982* R64 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Leslie Allen 6-1 6-0 Kate Latham Match data Jun 10, 1982* R32 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Leslie Allen 6-1 1-6 6-1 Kate Latham Match data Jan 7, 1982* R32 Washington Open WTA 500 Carpet
Kate Latham 6-2 6-4 Leslie Allen Match data Jul 30, 1981* R32 San Diego WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leslie Allen — — — 1,887 87 123 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kate Latham — — — 1,865 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leslie Allen Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1978 0–3 0.0% — 1,458 0 0 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1979 6–11 35.3% — 1,540 0 0 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1980 12–21 36.4% — 1,606 0 0 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1981 27–23 54.0% — 1,774 0 1 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,749 0 3
25 1982 25–22 53.2% — 1,820 0 1 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,662 0 3
26 1983 12–17 41.4% — 1,776 0 1 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,853 0 3
27 1984 2–14 12.5% — 1,574 0 1 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,554 0 1 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,775 0 5
29 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,525 0 1 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,685 0 5
30 1987 0–2 0.0% — 1,508 0 1 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,624 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,493 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,527 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leslie Allen Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1977 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1980 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 7 7 0.0% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 12 10 22 54.5% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1983 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1984 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1985 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 12 31 43 27.9% 16 24 40 40.0% 25 24 49 51.0% 33 42 75 44.0% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leslie Allen Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.61
20 1977 1488 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.04 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1978 1458 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.31 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.17
22 1979 1541 123.3 — — — — +64 +3 — 36.8% -1.10 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.3 +0.65 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.71
23 1980 1607 121.1 — — — — -92 -37 -60 39.0% -0.95 5–8 (38%) 5–1 (83%) 103.7 -1.83 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.34
24 1981 1775 141.5 — — — — -91 -137 -74 52.1% 0.00 11–8 (58%) 6–3 (67%) 107.0 -2.51 1977 1750 140.9 — — — — -8 -120 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -1.23
25 1982 1820 139.9 — — — — -123 -220 +4 51.0% +0.08 7–5 (58%) 5–7 (42%) 103.9 -0.98 1978 1663 118.4 — — — — +3 -12 +67 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +1.97
26 1983 1777 130.2 — — — — -41 -140 +38 43.9% -0.89 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.95 1979 1853 149.7 — — — — -20 -164 -98 46.0% -0.27 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -2.28
27 1984 1575 92.4 — — — — +9 +42 +140 16.7% -2.42 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 -0.09 1980 1750 133.2 — — — — -27 — +15 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.93
28 1985 1554 99.8 — — — — +29 — — 20.0% -2.80 — — — -0.17 1981 1776 142.9 — — — — -18 — +4 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.97
29 1986 1525 100.2 — — — — — +33 — 37.5% -0.56 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) 97.4 +0.67 1982 1686 128.3 — — — — +50 -103 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.20
30 1987 1508 105.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — -0.15 1983 1624 115.1 — — — — +52 -49 +72 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.86
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1493 91.7 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 1887 132.2 — — — — -63 -70 -13 42.4% -0.65 34–34 (50%) 22–26 (46%) 103.5 -2.41 — 1866 138.2 — — — — -3 -78 -9 49.2% -0.03 56–61 (48%) 41–38 (52%) 101.2 +0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.