H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Leslie Allen vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 2-0
Leslie Allen holds a 2–0 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leslie Allen leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leslie Allen won the 1982 Oakland third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 69
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1982* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Leslie Allen | 6-4 6-2 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1981* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Leslie Allen | 7-5 6-4 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leslie Allen | — | — | — | 1,911 | 87 | 121 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leslie Allen | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1982 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |