H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Leslie Allen vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 2-0

Leslie Allen holds a 2–0 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leslie Allen leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leslie Allen won the 1982 Oakland round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Leslie Allen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leslie Allen 6-4 6-2 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Feb 25, 1982* R32 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Leslie Allen 7-5 6-4 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Jun 18, 1981* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leslie Allen — — — 1,887 87 123 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — #9 — 2,083 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leslie Allen Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,803 0 2
15 — — — — — — — 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,873 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,845 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,851 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,976 0 3
19 — — — — — — — 1986 34–16 68.0% #9 1,975 0 4
20 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,903 0 4
21 1978 0–3 0.0% — 1,458 0 0 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,813 0 4
22 1979 6–11 35.3% — 1,540 0 0 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,788 0 4
23 1980 12–21 36.4% — 1,606 0 0 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,697 0 4
24 1981 27–23 54.0% — 1,774 0 1 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,589 0 4
25 1982 25–22 53.2% — 1,820 0 1 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4
26 1983 12–17 41.4% — 1,776 0 1 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,628 0 4
27 1984 2–14 12.5% — 1,574 0 1 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,585 0 4
28 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,554 0 1 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,609 0 4
29 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,525 0 1 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,555 0 4
30 1987 0–2 0.0% — 1,508 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leslie Allen Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 8 5 13 61.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 6 3 9 66.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 15 5 20 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1977 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1989 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1980 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 7 7 0.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1981 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 1991 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 12 10 22 54.5% 1992 5 8 13 38.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1983 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1984 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1985 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 31 43 27.9% 16 24 40 40.0% 25 24 49 51.0% 33 42 75 44.0% — 99 84 183 54.1% 98 59 157 62.4% 27 24 51 52.9% 49 43 92 53.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leslie Allen Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1505 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.1% -0.42 1–0 1–1 — -0.02
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1804 135.2 — — — — -9 -131 -222 61.5% +1.17 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +2.43
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1873 149.1 — — — — -69 -6 -216 60.4% +0.54 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 107.8 -3.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1846 139.3 — — — — -46 +102 -186 58.6% +0.96 12–7 (63%) 1–7 (13%) 99.3 +2.67
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1852 137.3 — — — — -38 +58 -144 55.9% +0.22 9–5 (64%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.53
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1977 159.0 — — — — -30 -57 -101 70.6% +1.53 9–2 (82%) 3–5 (38%) 105.7 -3.00
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1975 158.0 — — — — -2 +51 — 63.6% +1.08 8–6 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 -3.48
20 1977 1488 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.04 1987 1904 131.1 — — — — +36 +49 — 61.4% +0.60 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 100.1 +0.21
21 1978 1458 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.31 1988 1813 123.2 — — — — +53 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -1.28
22 1979 1541 123.3 — — — — +64 +3 — 36.8% -1.10 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.3 +0.65 1989 1789 141.3 — — — — +18 +110 -21 50.0% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 -4.18
23 1980 1607 121.1 — — — — -92 -37 -60 39.0% -0.95 5–8 (38%) 5–1 (83%) 103.7 -1.83 1990 1698 132.3 — — — — +66 +103 — 44.7% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.06
24 1981 1775 141.5 — — — — -91 -137 -74 52.1% 0.00 11–8 (58%) 6–3 (67%) 107.0 -2.51 1991 1590 119.8 — — — — +56 +172 — 36.7% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–5 (0%) 93.8 +0.93
25 1982 1820 139.9 — — — — -123 -220 +4 51.0% +0.08 7–5 (58%) 5–7 (42%) 103.9 -0.98 1992 1586 115.3 — — — — -4 +158 +154 45.2% -0.50 4–8 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 92.9 +1.34
26 1983 1777 130.2 — — — — -41 -140 +38 43.9% -0.89 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.95 1993 1629 119.3 — — — — -56 +111 — 45.9% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 101.8 +0.90
27 1984 1575 92.4 — — — — +9 +42 +140 16.7% -2.42 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 -0.09 1994 1586 107.2 — — — — -57 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 — — -0.20
28 1985 1554 99.8 — — — — +29 — — 20.0% -2.80 — — — -0.17 1995 1609 114.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.56
29 1986 1525 100.2 — — — — — +33 — 37.5% -0.56 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) 97.4 +0.67 1996 1555 105.6 — — — — -33 +118 +211 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 +0.42
30 1987 1508 105.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1887 132.2 — — — — -63 -70 -13 42.4% -0.65 34–34 (50%) 22–26 (46%) 103.5 -2.41 — 2083 146.0 — — — — -6 +45 -86 55.0% +0.38 95–63 (60%) 41–44 (48%) 102.1 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.