H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Leslie Allen vs Kim Jones H2H: 1-0

Leslie Allen holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leslie Allen leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Leslie Allen won the 1982 Detroit round of 32 6-2 6-1.

USA Age 69 Right-Handed
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 68

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leslie Allen 6-2 6-1 Kim Jones Match data Feb 4, 1982* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leslie Allen 1,886 87 122 41.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kim Jones 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leslie Allen Kim Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1977 0–2 0.0% 1,487 0 0 1978 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0
21 1978 0–3 0.0% 1,458 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0
22 1979 6–11 35.3% 1,540 0 0 1980 1–10 9.1% 1,422 0 0
23 1980 12–20 37.5% 1,609 0 0 1981 6–13 31.6% 1,458 0 0
24 1981 27–23 54.0% 1,774 0 1 1982 4–14 22.2% 1,483 0 0
25 1982 25–22 53.2% 1,819 0 1 1983 20–14 58.8% 1,757 0 1
26 1983 12–17 41.4% 1,775 0 1 1984 13–24 35.1% 1,667 0 1
27 1984 2–14 12.5% 1,574 0 1 1985 13–18 41.9% 1,724 0 1
28 1985 1–4 20.0% 1,553 0 1 1986 2–4 33.3% 1,677 0 1
29 1986 2–4 33.3% 1,524 0 1 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,629 0 1
30 1987 0–2 0.0% 1,507 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leslie Allen Kim Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1977 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1980 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1981 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 12 10 22 54.5% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1983 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1984 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1985 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 12 31 43 27.9% 16 24 40 40.0% 25 24 49 51.0% 33 41 74 44.6% 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leslie Allen Kim Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1977 1488 100.2 33.3% -0.50 0–2 +0.04 1978 1506 102.4 50.0% -0.75 -0.08
21 1978 1458 96.5 0.0% -2.25 +0.35 1979 1490 +0.09
22 1979 1540 122.9 +64 +4 36.8% -1.10 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.3 +0.67 1980 1423 94.6 +36 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50
23 1980 1610 121.7 -87 -40 -63 39.2% -0.90 5–7 (42%) 5–1 (83%) 104.7 -1.93 1981 1459 107.5 +44 +75 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +1.50
24 1981 1774 141.2 -88 -136 -74 52.1% 0.00 11–8 (58%) 6–3 (67%) 106.9 -2.47 1982 1484 103.7 -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59
25 1982 1820 139.6 -122 -220 +3 51.0% +0.08 7–5 (58%) 5–7 (42%) 103.8 -1.82 1983 1758 131.9 -40 -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43
26 1983 1776 129.9 -40 -140 +39 43.9% -0.89 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.80 1984 1667 132.6 +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22
27 1984 1574 92.3 +9 +43 +139 16.7% -2.42 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 -0.10 1985 1725 135.5 -10 -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52
28 1985 1554 99.8 +28 20.0% -2.80 -0.17 1986 1677 104.5 -12 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.70
29 1986 1524 100.2 +34 37.5% -0.56 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) 97.4 +0.79 1987 1629 103.9 -23 11.1% -2.67 0–1 -0.24
30 1987 1507 104.8 0.0% -2.25 0–1 -0.10
Career 1886 132.1 -61 -70 -14 42.5% -0.64 34–33 (51%) 22–26 (46%) 103.8 -2.68 1801 126.3 -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.