H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Leslie Allen vs Pam Casale H2H: 0-2
Pam Casale holds a 2–0 lead over Leslie Allen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1982 Tokyo Tv Open fourth round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 1982* | Tokyo Tv Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Pam Casale | 7-6 7-6 | Leslie Allen | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1981* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Pam Casale | 6-3 6-0 | Leslie Allen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leslie Allen | — | — | — | 1,911 | 87 | 121 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leslie Allen | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |