H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Leslie Allen vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 2-3
Regina Marsikova holds a 3–2 lead over Leslie Allen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Regina Marsikova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Regina Marsikova won the 1980 Deerfield Beach third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1980* | Deerfield Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Regina Marsikova | 6-2 6-1 | Leslie Allen | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1980* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Leslie Allen | 6-3 3-6 8-6 | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1980* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Leslie Allen | 1-5 (ret.) | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1979* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Regina Marsikova | 6-4 6-2 | Leslie Allen | Match data |
| Dec 10, 1977* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Regina Marsikova | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Leslie Allen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leslie Allen | — | — | — | 1,911 | 87 | 121 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Regina Marsikova | — | — | — | 2,044 | 266 | 198 | 57.3% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leslie Allen | Regina Marsikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 37–17 | 68.5% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 56–30 | 65.1% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 38–24 | 61.3% | — | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 21 | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 33–22 | 60.0% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 14 |
| 22 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 15 |
| 23 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1982 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 15 |
| 27 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 15 |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 15 |