H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Leslie Allen vs Sandy Collins H2H: 1-1
Leslie Allen and Sandy Collins are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandy Collins leads 1–0 on carpet, while Leslie Allen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandy Collins won the 1980 Tucson third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 1980* | Tucson | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sandy Collins | 6-2 7-5 | Leslie Allen | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1979* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Leslie Allen | 6-3 6-4 | Sandy Collins | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leslie Allen | — | — | — | 1,911 | 87 | 121 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sandy Collins | — | — | — | 1,823 | 89 | 151 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leslie Allen | Sandy Collins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,407 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,414 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,408 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,394 | 0 | 0 |