H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Leslie Allen vs Terry Holladay H2H: 0-3

Terry Holladay holds a 3–0 lead over Leslie Allen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Terry Holladay leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Terry Holladay won the 1984 Salt Lake City round of 32 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Leslie Allen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Terry Holladay
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Terry Holladay #69 7-5 7-6 Leslie Allen Match data Sep 13, 1984* R32 Salt Lake City WTA 250 Hard
Terry Holladay 6-3 6-3 Leslie Allen Match data Sep 13, 1980* SF Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 Hard
Terry Holladay 4-6 7-5 6-2 Leslie Allen Match data Aug 20, 1980* R64 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leslie Allen — — — 1,886 87 122 41.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Terry Holladay #395 #39 7 1,942 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leslie Allen Terry Holladay
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1972 2–3 40.0% — 1,473 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1973 4–2 66.7% — 1,507 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1974 12–17 41.4% — 1,563 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1975 32–23 58.2% — 1,758 0 0
20 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1976 28–20 58.3% — 1,880 0 1
21 1978 0–3 0.0% — 1,458 0 0 1977 15–15 50.0% — 1,935 0 1
22 1979 6–11 35.3% — 1,540 0 0 1978 2–8 20.0% — 1,860 0 1
23 1980 12–20 37.5% — 1,609 0 0 1979 17–18 48.6% — 1,829 0 1
24 1981 27–23 54.0% — 1,774 0 1 1980 25–21 54.3% — 1,825 0 1
25 1982 25–22 53.2% — 1,819 0 1 1981 4–12 25.0% — 1,672 0 1
26 1983 12–17 41.4% — 1,775 0 1 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,638 0 1
27 1984 2–14 12.5% — 1,574 0 1 1983 9–8 52.9% — 1,678 0 1
28 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,553 0 1 1984 15–16 48.4% #50 1,676 0 1
29 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,524 0 1 1985 9–16 36.0% — 1,608 0 1
30 1987 0–2 0.0% — 1,507 0 1 1986 5–8 38.5% #103 1,627 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1987 0–9 0.0% #315 1,511 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leslie Allen Terry Holladay
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
20 1977 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1976 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 9 23 60.9%
21 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1977 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1980 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 1979 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 9 14 35.7%
24 1981 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 12 23 47.8%
25 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 12 10 22 54.5% 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1983 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1984 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1985 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 12 31 43 27.9% 16 24 40 40.0% 25 24 49 51.0% 33 41 74 44.6% — 64 69 133 48.1% 23 27 50 46.0% 42 39 81 51.9% 50 64 114 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leslie Allen Terry Holladay
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1489 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1473 99.7 — — — — +72 — — 45.5% -0.27 0–1 0–1 — +1.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1507 105.7 — — — — +97 — — 66.7% +1.08 — 1–0 — +1.72
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1564 120.1 — — — — -36 +43 — 44.6% -0.46 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 +1.00
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1759 130.6 — — — — -20 -115 -113 57.1% +0.64 10–10 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 +3.05
20 1977 1488 100.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.04 1976 1881 145.1 — — — — +18 -233 -149 59.2% +0.31 4–4 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 105.5 -2.82
21 1978 1458 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.35 1977 1935 148.1 — — — — -11 — -129 51.5% +0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.8 -5.13
22 1979 1540 122.9 — — — — +64 +4 — 36.8% -1.10 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.3 +0.67 1978 1860 129.1 — — — — -14 — -55 37.5% -0.92 1–5 (17%) 1–3 (25%) 94.1 -1.83
23 1980 1610 121.7 — — — — -87 -40 -63 39.2% -0.90 5–7 (42%) 5–1 (83%) 104.7 -1.93 1979 1830 140.2 — — — — -3 — — 49.3% +0.03 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.65
24 1981 1774 141.2 — — — — -88 -136 -74 52.1% 0.00 11–8 (58%) 6–3 (67%) 106.9 -2.47 1980 1825 148.0 — — — — +8 — -5 52.0% +0.20 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 -3.22
25 1982 1820 139.6 — — — — -122 -220 +3 51.0% +0.08 7–5 (58%) 5–7 (42%) 103.8 -1.82 1981 1672 108.6 — — — — +73 — +82 30.3% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.08
26 1983 1776 129.9 — — — — -40 -140 +39 43.9% -0.89 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.80 1982 1638 94.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — 0.00
27 1984 1574 92.3 — — — — +9 +43 +139 16.7% -2.42 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 -0.10 1983 1679 131.8 — — — — +14 — +103 57.1% +0.28 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +1.24
28 1985 1554 99.8 — — — — +28 — — 20.0% -2.80 — — — -0.17 1984 1677 119.7 — — — — +9 — +71 46.8% -0.44 9–6 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 100.8 +1.76
29 1986 1524 100.2 — — — — — +34 — 37.5% -0.56 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) 97.4 +0.79 1985 1608 118.7 — — — — +24 — +88 40.7% -0.75 4–5 (44%) 1–5 (17%) 98.1 +0.50
30 1987 1507 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — -0.10 1986 1628 114.8 — — — — -6 — +92 40.7% -0.70 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 +0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1511 88.0 — — — — +46 — +95 5.3% -3.53 0–1 0–1 — +0.19
Career — 1886 132.1 — — — — -61 -70 -14 42.5% -0.64 34–33 (51%) 22–26 (46%) 103.8 -2.68 — 1943 138.0 — — — — +8 -60 -15 48.8% -0.14 51–55 (48%) 33–39 (46%) 98.9 -0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.