H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lilia Osterloh vs Anna Tatishvili H2H: 1-0

Lilia Osterloh holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Tatishvili in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lilia Osterloh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lilia Osterloh won the 2007 Cincinnati Open round of 16 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Anna Tatishvili
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lilia Osterloh #112 7-5 6-1 Anna Tatishvili #368 Match data Jul 20, 2007* R16 Cincinnati Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anna Tatishvili #1,071 #50 1,210 1,615 44 93 32.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lilia Osterloh Anna Tatishvili
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #1156 1,485 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #302 1,502 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–5 16.7% #285 1,456 0 0
18 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #160 1,444 0 0
19 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #177 1,423 0 0
20 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0 2010 4–6 40.0% #134 1,467 0 0
21 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0 2011 7–14 33.3% #89 1,493 0 0
22 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0 2012 16–18 47.1% #51 1,602 0 0
23 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0 2013 4–18 18.2% #127 1,492 0 0
24 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0 2014 0–6 0.0% #146 1,438 0 0
25 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0 2015 7–8 46.7% #101 1,507 0 0
26 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0 2016 3–8 27.3% #200 1,464 0 0
27 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0 2017 0–2 0.0% #516 1,445 0 0
28 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0 2019 0–1 0.0% #998 1,436 0 0
30 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lilia Osterloh Anna Tatishvili
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2012 8 7 15 53.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2013 0 10 10 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 5 7 12 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
26 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3% — 19 51 70 27.1% 20 32 52 38.5% 5 10 15 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 52/70 of Lilia Osterloh's and 120/136 of Anna Tatishvili's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lilia Osterloh Anna Tatishvili
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 5/5 0.2 7.2 60.9% 52.1% 37.1% 52.3% 41.0% 46.6% 43.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/6 1.8 4.3 63.6% 55.3% 44.7% 41.1% 36.9% 51.3% 41.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 2.0 10.0 58.4% 53.8% 35.1% 40.0% 66.7% 46.1% 45.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 1.5 5.5 65.3% 52.8% 35.6% 45.0% 41.5% 46.4% 44.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 10/10 0.4 4.5 72.1% 54.8% 41.7% 48.4% 43.7% 51.0% 42.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 21/21 0.8 3.9 71.3% 54.6% 40.0% 36.7% 46.6% 50.4% 44.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 31/34 1.6 4.4 67.1% 57.4% 43.7% 48.3% 51.0% 52.5% 43.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 18/22 0.9 4.4 63.5% 48.7% 39.9% 44.9% 44.2% 45.5% 40.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 5/6 1.0 5.4 61.0% 55.4% 33.5% 45.4% 28.9% 47.3% 38.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 9/15 1.2 1.8 69.7% 59.4% 47.1% 49.3% 53.9% 56.0% 43.1%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 11/11 1.7 5.0 64.2% 61.3% 45.2% 54.1% 42.5% 54.8% 39.2%
27 2005 3/11 0.3 4.3 60.5% 46.3% 46.2% 38.9% 66.7% 46.9% 37.3% 2017 2/2 0.5 5.5 59.2% 55.0% 28.8% 41.7% 23.1% 43.1% 29.0%
28 2006 7/14 0.9 3.6 66.1% 56.0% 39.1% 42.7% 47.9% 49.6% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 17/19 1.8 3.6 60.1% 54.8% 45.0% 46.6% 44.5% 50.6% 43.6% 2019 1/1 0.0 4.0 58.5% 33.3% 17.6% 14.3% 20.0% 26.8% 38.5%
30 2008 12/13 1.3 4.6 58.3% 60.2% 37.4% 55.9% 42.2% 50.7% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 6/6 2.2 2.7 62.8% 60.1% 48.3% 55.1% 59.7% 56.1% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 7/7 2.9 3.0 61.3% 57.0% 39.1% 47.3% 54.5% 50.0% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 52/221 1.7 3.7 61.0% 56.6% 42.1% 48.9% 48.8% 50.8% 42.1% — 120/137 1.1 4.4 66.7% 55.2% 41.4% 45.7% 45.5% 50.4% 42.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lilia Osterloh Anna Tatishvili
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1486 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.05
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1503 107.1 -1.97 -1.16 0.819 45.5% +3 — — 33.3% -1.67 2–0 2–0 — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1457 98.2 -1.65 -2.40 0.853 46.6% +30 — — 26.7% -1.53 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.24
18 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06 2008 1445 99.5 +0.37 -0.11 0.846 45.9% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.07
19 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04 2009 1423 97.5 -2.50 -0.92 0.822 45.3% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.08
20 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07 2010 1467 106.2 -2.74 -1.42 0.870 46.8% -3 +70 — 37.5% -1.13 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -0.24
21 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06 2011 1493 109.7 -3.47 +0.38 0.892 47.4% -31 +21 +123 37.3% -0.92 4–5 (44%) 2–0 — -0.54
22 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05 2012 1603 121.9 -2.57 -0.58 0.917 48.2% -29 -66 +25 48.6% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 101.7 +1.20
23 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27 2013 1492 109.8 -6.30 -0.93 0.743 43.1% -24 +61 — 27.5% -1.71 3–6 (33%) 0–6 (0%) 95.0 -1.42
24 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31 2014 1438 99.1 -2.75 -1.09 0.721 41.8% -11 — — 0.0% -3.17 — 0–1 — -0.11
25 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04 2015 1507 120.0 -1.39 +0.32 0.979 49.8% -24 +52 — 48.3% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.48
26 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58 2016 1465 99.1 -1.19 -1.79 0.868 47.1% -43 +61 +114 40.0% -1.12 1–4 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 97.3 +0.73
27 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 2017 1445 96.1 -2.88 -0.25 0.510 37.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07
28 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55 2019 1436 97.6 -1.44 +0.62 0.526 33.3% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.08
30 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89 — 1615 112.7 -3.01 -0.67 0.850 46.4% -21 +16 +80 36.5% -1.09 21–29 (42%) 15–17 (47%) 100.2 +0.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.