H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lilia Osterloh vs Jana Nejedly H2H: 0-1

Jana Nejedly holds a 1–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Nejedly leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Nejedly won the 2001 Scottsdale round of 32 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jana Nejedly
CAN Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jana Nejedly #76 7-5 6-2 Lilia Osterloh #50 Match data Mar 1, 2001* R32 Scottsdale Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jana Nejedly #914 #64 488 1,625 49 105 31.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lilia Osterloh Jana Nejedly
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0 1993 0–3 0.0% #328 1,462 0 0
20 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0 1994 3–9 25.0% #139 1,467 0 0
21 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0 1995 11–12 47.8% #82 1,580 0 0
22 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0 1996 3–9 25.0% #130 1,552 0 0
23 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0 1997 0–2 0.0% #137 1,541 0 0
24 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0 1998 4–9 30.8% #75 1,556 0 0
25 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0 1999 5–13 27.8% #88 1,496 0 0
26 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0 2000 12–20 37.5% #69 1,528 0 0
27 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0 2001 8–17 32.0% #96 1,520 0 0
28 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0 2002 3–11 21.4% #233 1,423 0 0
29 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lilia Osterloh Jana Nejedly
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1995 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 4 9 13 30.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3% — 31 58 89 34.8% 8 22 30 26.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lilia Osterloh Jana Nejedly
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04 1993 1463 89.4 — — — — +32 — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — +0.21
20 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07 1994 1468 119.4 — — — — +17 — — 28.6% -1.54 2–2 (50%) — — +0.14
21 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06 1995 1580 127.6 — — — — -12 — — 49.1% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.69
22 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05 1996 1552 113.3 — — — — +10 — — 34.5% -1.14 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 95.3 -0.52
23 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27 1997 1541 109.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.12
24 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31 1998 1556 109.7 — — — — +2 -49 — 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — -1.14
25 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04 1999 1496 102.5 — — — — +42 -14 — 27.5% -1.72 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.67
26 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58 2000 1528 107.0 — — — — -2 -12 -40 36.5% -1.16 7–3 (70%) 3–4 (43%) 105.5 +0.89
27 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 2001 1520 113.4 — — — — +22 -60 — 36.8% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.7 +0.87
28 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94 2002 1423 84.2 — — — — +66 — — 23.3% -1.97 1–1 1–1 — +1.39
29 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89 — 1625 113.2 — — — — +15 -29 -40 34.0% -1.19 21–21 (50%) 8–15 (35%) 101.1 +1.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.