H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lilia Osterloh vs Jennifer Hopkins H2H: 1-1

Lilia Osterloh and Jennifer Hopkins are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jennifer Hopkins leads 1–0 on carpet, while Lilia Osterloh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lilia Osterloh won the 2001 Stanford round of 32 7-6(4) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Jennifer Hopkins
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lilia Osterloh #56 7-6(4) 6-0 Jennifer Hopkins #68 Match data Jul 26, 2001* R32 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Jennifer Hopkins #89 6-1 4-6 6-1 Lilia Osterloh #45 Match data Nov 7, 2000* R32 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jennifer Hopkins #1,286 #52 671 1,633 37 71 34.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lilia Osterloh Jennifer Hopkins
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0 1999 0–2 0.0% #138 1,481 0 0
19 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0 2000 8–11 42.1% #84 1,525 0 0
20 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0 2001 20–24 45.5% #57 1,615 0 0
21 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0 2002 6–21 22.2% #140 1,465 0 0
22 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #159 1,447 0 0
23 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #137 1,429 0 0
24 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0 2005 1–4 20.0% #212 1,420 0 0
25 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lilia Osterloh Jennifer Hopkins
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 5 11 16 31.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2003 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2004 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3% — 22 37 59 37.3% 9 21 30 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 6 10 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lilia Osterloh Jennifer Hopkins
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06 1999 1481 96.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
19 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04 2000 1525 120.7 — — — — +12 +54 — 39.5% -0.42 4–3 (57%) 0–2 — -0.12
20 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07 2001 1616 128.6 — — — — +28 -77 -80 48.0% -0.22 4–10 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.8 +0.38
21 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06 2002 1465 104.1 — — — — +72 -25 — 29.7% -1.44 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 92.0 -0.61
22 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05 2003 1448 100.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.09
23 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27 2004 1430 95.3 -0.87 -2.43 0.652 42.0% +47 — — 26.3% -2.32 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.09
24 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31 2005 1421 96.3 -0.61 -2.00 0.607 39.3% +15 — — 18.2% -2.18 1–0 — — -0.19
25 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89 — 1634 116.7 -0.81 -2.32 0.641 41.3% +38 -8 -80 37.7% -0.88 12–23 (34%) 5–13 (28%) 90.2 -0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.