H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Kristina Mladenovic H2H: 1-0
Lin Zhu holds a 1–0 lead over Kristina Mladenovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lin Zhu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2021 Seoul final 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2021 | Seoul | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Lin Zhu | 6-0 6-4 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Kristina Mladenovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |