H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Linda Wild vs Pam Shriver H2H: 3-2

Linda Wild holds a 3–2 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet, while Linda Wild leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1996 Oakland round of 16 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Linda Wild
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Linda Wild #33 6-3 6-0 Pam Shriver #229 Match data Nov 8, 1996* R16 Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Linda Wild #61 6-7 7-5 7-6 Pam Shriver #144 Match data Nov 3, 1995* R16 Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Pam Shriver #91 4-6 7-5 6-3 Linda Wild #50 Match data Feb 9, 1995* R32 Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Linda Wild #48 6-3 6-0 Pam Shriver #62 Match data Jan 18, 1995* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Pam Shriver #20 6-1 6-2 Linda Wild #154 Match data Feb 17, 1990* QF Chicago Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Linda Wild #252 #23 823 1,815 135 146 48.0% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Linda Wild Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
1989 1–7 12.5% #155 1,457 0 0 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1
1990 9–12 42.9% #86 1,554 0 0 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2
1991 20–19 51.3% #41 1,720 0 0 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4
1992 19–21 47.5% #49 1,732 0 0 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5
1993 24–18 57.1% #45 1,764 0 2 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8
1994 20–19 51.3% #49 1,740 0 2 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
1995 17–13 56.7% #58 1,758 0 4 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14
1996 22–16 57.9% #29 1,809 0 5 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
1997 3–14 17.6% #223 1,625 0 5 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20
1999 0–3 0.0% #191 1,566 0 5 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
2000 0–3 0.0% #252 1,540 0 5 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
— — — — — — — 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
— — — — — — — 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
— — — — — — — 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
— — — — — — — 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
— — — — — — — 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
— — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
— — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
— — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Linda Wild Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
1989 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
1990 3 6 9 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
1991 8 9 17 47.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
1992 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
1993 15 9 24 62.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
1995 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
1996 15 10 25 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
1997 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 70 79 149 47.0% 19 30 49 38.8% 19 19 38 50.0% 27 18 45 60.0% Career 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Linda Wild Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1972 1493 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06
1989 1457 103.4 — — — — +30 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 — — -0.09 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83
1990 1555 123.6 — — — — +1 -3 — 43.2% -0.52 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 -0.32 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03
1991 1721 134.6 — — — — -71 -49 -115 50.0% -0.26 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 107.4 -0.67 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74
1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -89 -75 +45 47.8% -0.05 6–6 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 -1.52 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82
1993 1765 132.8 — — — — +27 -174 -41 56.4% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 99.5 +0.50 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79
1994 1741 132.8 — — — — -38 -164 +80 51.6% -0.05 8–9 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 -1.90 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74
1995 1758 128.9 — — — — +19 -201 +14 58.0% +0.57 3–6 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 +1.45 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23
1996 1810 144.4 — — — — +25 -227 -22 55.2% +0.55 7–6 (54%) 6–8 (43%) 101.6 +0.67 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63
1997 1625 106.2 — — — — +96 -90 +72 25.6% -2.15 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 +0.19 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44
1999 1567 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.38 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71
2000 1541 109.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.42 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
Career 1816 137.3 — — — — -7 -98 +18 48.5% -0.14 43–42 (51%) 31–29 (52%) 102.2 -0.65 Career 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.