H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Lindsay Blachford vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 2-0
Lindsay Blachford holds a 2–0 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Blachford leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Lindsay Blachford won the 1975 Eastbourne second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1975* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Lindsay Blachford | 6-3 6-2 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1973* | London Rothmans | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Lindsay Blachford | 7-5 2-1 (ret.) | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Blachford | — | — | — | 1,636 | 55 | 79 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsay Blachford | Raquel Giscafre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 |