H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 14-4

Lindsay Davenport holds a 14–4 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 18 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 11–3 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2006 Beijing quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
14 – 4
18 main draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 23, 2006* Beijing WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-4 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #12 Match data
Aug 26, 2006* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #11 6-4 7-5 Amélie Mauresmo #1 Match data
Oct 9, 2005* Filderstadt WTA 500 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #4 Match data
Aug 28, 2005* New Haven WTA 500 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #3 Match data
Jul 2, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Lindsay Davenport #1 6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #3 Match data
Oct 10, 2004* Filderstadt WTA 500 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 (ret.) Amélie Mauresmo #1 Match data
Apr 11, 2004* Amelia Island WTA 500 F Clay Lindsay Davenport #4 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #3 Match data
Mar 10, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #7 (w/o) Amélie Mauresmo #8 Match data
Aug 24, 2002* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #10 7-6(7) 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #9 Match data
Oct 13, 2001* Filderstadt WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-4 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #6 Match data
Aug 24, 2001* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #8 Match data
Jan 12, 2001* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 (w/o) Amélie Mauresmo #16 Match data
Jan 13, 2000* Sydney WTA 500 F Hard Amélie Mauresmo #9 7-6(2) 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Nov 15, 1999 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Lindsay Davenport #2 3-6 6-3 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #10 Match data
Sep 25, 1999* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-1 6-1 Amélie Mauresmo #14 Match data
Aug 28, 1999* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-1 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #17 Match data
Jan 31, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #29 4-6 7-5 7-5 Lindsay Davenport #1 Match data
May 15, 1998* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #65 6-2 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —