H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Anastasia Myskina H2H: 6-2

Lindsay Davenport holds a 6–2 lead over Anastasia Myskina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 6–1 on hard courts, while Anastasia Myskina leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2005 Zurich semifinal 6-0 6-4.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 22, 2005* Zurich WTA 1000 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-0 6-4 Anastasia Myskina #12 Match data
Oct 8, 2005* Filderstadt WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 3-6 6-1 Anastasia Myskina #12 Match data
Nov 10, 2004 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Anastasia Myskina #3 7-6(5) 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #1 Match data
Oct 16, 2004* Moscow WTA 1000 SF Carpet Anastasia Myskina #4 6-4 7-6(1) Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Oct 9, 2004* Filderstadt WTA 500 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-4 Anastasia Myskina #4 Match data
Aug 1, 2004* San Diego WTA 1000 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 6-1 6-1 Anastasia Myskina #5 Match data
Aug 24, 2002* New Haven WTA 500 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #10 6-2 6-2 Anastasia Myskina #16 Match data
Aug 23, 2001* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-2 6-1 Anastasia Myskina #118 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Anastasia Myskina #1,101 #2 4,247 2,084 235 138 63.0% 1 3 0 4 2 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Anastasia Myskina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1999 10–6 62.5% #65 1,620 0 1
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 2000 15–17 46.9% #58 1,657 0 1
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 2001 11–13 45.8% #59 1,707 0 1
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 2002 46–27 63.0% #11 1,882 0 2
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 2003 42–21 66.7% #7 1,958 0 6
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 2004 45–16 73.8% #3 2,040 1 9
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 2005 35–18 66.0% #14 1,934 1 10
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 2006 31–18 63.3% #16 1,818 1 10
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2007 0–2 0.0% #1043 1,769 1 10
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54