H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Elena Bovina H2H: 5-1

Lindsay Davenport holds a 5–1 lead over Elena Bovina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 US Open third round 7-6(7) 6-2.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 5, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 7-6(7) 6-2 Elena Bovina #19 Match data
Oct 11, 2003* Filderstadt WTA 500 QF Hard Elena Bovina #31 6-3 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #4 Match data
Mar 9, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #7 6-4 6-3 Elena Bovina #17 Match data
Oct 5, 2002* Moscow WTA 1000 QF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #8 3-6 6-3 6-3 Elena Bovina #34 Match data
Sep 5, 2002* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #10 3-6 6-0 6-2 Elena Bovina #61 Match data
Aug 7, 2002* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #9 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 Elena Bovina #83 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Elena Bovina #777 #14 1,758 1,960 127 110 53.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Elena Bovina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 2000 3–5 37.5% #133 1,500 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 2001 16–19 45.7% #49 1,576 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 2002 29–19 60.4% #26 1,803 0 2
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 2003 25–22 53.2% #21 1,831 0 2
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 2004 37–18 67.3% #15 1,951 0 3
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 2005 12–8 60.0% #61 1,908 0 3
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 2006 0–2 0.0% #1431 1,862 0 3
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 2007 1–6 14.3% #329 1,757 0 3
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2008 2–1 66.7% #186 1,756 0 3
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2009 1–2 33.3% #210 1,728 0 3
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2010 0–4 0.0% #162 1,653 0 3
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2011 1–4 20.0% #301 1,599 0 3
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54