H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 1-0
Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2005 Tokyo quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2005* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | QF | Carpet | Lindsay Davenport | 6-1 6-2 | Iveta Benesova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsay Davenport | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |