H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Justine Henin H2H: 5-8
Justine Henin holds a 8–5 lead over Lindsay Davenport in their WTA head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 7–4 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2006 US Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5
–
8
13 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-4 6-4 | Lindsay Davenport | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2006* | New Haven | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-0 1-0 (ret.) | Lindsay Davenport | Match data |
| Jan 26, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Justine Henin | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Lindsay Davenport | Match data |
| Apr 16, 2005* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Justine Henin | 3-6 6-3 1-0 (ret.) | Lindsay Davenport | Match data |
| Mar 16, 2004* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-1 6-4 | Lindsay Davenport | Match data |
| Jan 30, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Justine Henin | 7-5 6-3 | Lindsay Davenport | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2004* | Sydney | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Justine Henin | (w/o) | Lindsay Davenport | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Justine Henin | 7-5 5-7 9-7 | Lindsay Davenport | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2002* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 7-6(2) 7-6(5) | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2001* | Filderstadt | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 7-5 6-4 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2000 | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-0 6-4 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2000* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| May 27, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 2-6 7-5 | Justine Henin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsay Davenport | Justine Henin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 |
| 24 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 |
| 25 | 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 |
| 27 | 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 |
| 29 | 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 |
| 30 | 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |